Capitalism

Samuel Bowles and the radicalism of reality-based economics

Drop everything you are doing right now and read Born Poor? | Santa Fe economist Samuel Bowles says you better get used to it right now. Here's a taste of why:

“Inequality,” she says, “really holds us back.”

Bowles offers a key reason why this is so. “Inequality breeds conflict, and conflict breeds wasted resources,” he says.

In short, in a very unequal society, the people at the top have to spend a lot of time and energy keeping the lower classes obedient and productive.

Inequality leads to an excess of what Bowles calls “guard labor.” In a 2007 paper on the subject, he and co-author Arjun Jayadev, an assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts, make an astonishing claim: Roughly 1 in 4 Americans is employed to keep fellow citizens in line and protect private wealth from would-be Robin Hoods.

The job descriptions of guard labor range from “imposing work discipline”—think of the corporate IT spies who keep desk jockeys from slacking off online—to enforcing laws, like the officers in the Santa Fe Police Department paddy wagon parked outside of Walmart.

The greater the inequalities in a society, the more guard labor it requires, Bowles finds.

It's moments like these, when am reading about economists doing empirical work on the fallacy of the "free market economy", that it makes want to go back in time to complete what would have been my Bachelor's Degree on Economics (yes, when I went into college, I wanted to become an economist).

What am more excited about discovering Samuel Bowles, is the fact that he considers himself a radical. Not because he theorizes about the eternal disruption of the status quo but because he has found evidence, actual material and empirical evidence, that point to the root causes of our present day economic problems.

 more this way»

liza's picture



Nick Carr on "Sharecropping the long tail"

Twitter and Facebook are for...

MySpace, Facebook, and many other businesses have realized that they can give away the tools of production but maintain ownership over the resulting products. One of the fundamental economic characteristics of Web 2.0 is the distribution of production into the hands of the many and the concentration of the economic rewards into the hands of the few. It's a sharecropping system, but the sharecroppers are generally happy because their interest lies in self-expression or socializing, not in making money, and, besides, the economic value of each of their individual contributions is trivial. It's only by aggregating those contributions on a massive scale - on a web scale - that the business becomes lucrative. To put it a different way, the sharecroppers operate happily in an attention economy while their overseers operate happily in a cash economy. In this view, the attention economy does not operate separately from the cash economy; it's simply a means of creating cheap inputs for the cash economy.

From Sharecropping the long tail

— Nick Carr

liza's picture



Capitalism: A Love Story


Michael Moore has been irritating me with his "Roger & Me" shitck: It's funny to go once to try to do a drop-by interview or citizen's arrest of the CEO once. It's not funny the fifth or sixth time around.

That said, am so totally watching this documentary if only for Marcy Kaptur, the best US Congresswoman New York never had. What her in all her glory:

 more this way»

liza's picture



Rasmussen Reports: The most comprehensive concern trolling data anywhere

concerntroll

Do you notice something on the page for Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere| Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism? Remember, "Rasmussen Reports" is allegedly a polling company not bent on generating false statistics.

Can't tell what am talking about? Well, let's put it this way : It's odd that a company that is supposed to be collecting unbiased statistical data is running advertising on their blogs. Why is this relevant? Have you noticed that outside of throwing those numbers they:

  • Do not tell us why they ran the survey
  • Do not give any information about the education of the respondents
  • Do not explain whether they defined "capitalism" or "socialism"

I kid you not, this is the only piece of "data" Rasmussen is giving out:
 more this way»

liza's picture



Newspapers are not conversations

Print Is Dead T-shirt

Andy Carvin (@acarvin) and Shireen Mitchell (@digitalsista) were having a back and forth about how newspapers are conversations. I totally disagree. Newspapers are anything but conversations.

When humans discovered they could draw on the side of a cave or scratch symbols in a clay tablet, they discovered how to preserve not just memories of events past but the hoped for images of events to come. Writing is an engine for the preservation of memory and imagination.

Newspapers do not fall outside of the mnemonic function of writing. Neither are blogs, comments in blogs, real-time chats or twitter. Yet the difference between newspapers and, for example, Twitter is the amount of change and velocity inherent in the structure of writing and publishing with Twitter.

This reminds me very much of my years of graduate study at NYU. In studying Nitezsche, Baudelaire and the history of the avant garde and modernist movements of the late 19th Century and early 20th Century, you can see a move against the totalitarian concept of not just truth but being.
 more this way»

liza's picture



Upsetting thought of the day

So let me get this straight : The US had 750 billion dollars to bail out Wall Street; a sector of the US economy which has been historically controlled by "white" or US Americans of European ascendancy. The US Congress found 750 billion dollars for them and their European and Asian investors. A bailout, by the way, that now said banks are pooh-poohing, lest the US Treasury and tax-payers find out the depths of their accounting infamies. Yet there's no money to pay back reparations to African Americans for the evils of slavery and Jim Crow laws?

Discuss.

[A scene from the movie Birth of a Nation (1915). Image found in Wikipedia under "Lynching in America")

liza's picture



Syndicate content

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES


if there were no blacks, jews or gays there would be no Oscars

Ellen DeGeneres

Poll