nutrition

Learning from Nature: Making a better wheat

Most of our modern crops were not selected for based on nutritional content so much as yield, ease of harvesting, appearance, etc. In other words, human agricultural endeavors have always been superficial, ignoring the inner qualities of our crops.

Turns out, modern science may allow us to improve our modern wheat strains to restore some of the nutritional qualities lost when we selected them from natural crops.

An article in the November 24th issue of Science describes the identification of a gene, Gpc-B1, coding for a protein called NAM-B1 which affects wheat grain protein, zinc, and iron content. This gene is mutated in the version of wheat (T. turgidum ssp. durum) that we use for pasta and bread and which accounts for about 20% of all calories consumed by humans worldwide. The mutation reduces the amount of protein, zinc and iron in the wheat grains by as much as 30%, meaning most of the wheat we consume is defective nutritionally compared with its wild ancestor, emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides). Crossing wild wheat with modern wheat crops will hopefully allow an increased protein and mineral content of the wheat we consume without affecting (we hope!) things like yield and taste.


mole333's picture

| | | |
Syndicate content

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 1184 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

When people in the media wish to criticize bloggers they should start naming names and start being specific. If we aren't important enough to be engaged specifically than ignore us. It's fair to talk about the blogosphere as a collective at times as it's fair to talk about the mainstream media as a collective at times, but complaining about the nasty tone of the whole party is just cheap and sloppy journalism.

The greater sin of Cohen today was implying that blog readers are balkanized into political camps and are therefore uninformed and stupid. That's one of the worst misconceptions of people who read blogs who are, after all, the people who are most interested in news and political debate - interested enough spend a more than healthy amount of time online keeping up to speed. Cohen shows contempt for the people most likely to know who he is and care about what he writes.


— Atrios (Duncan Black),Eschaton | Blog Rage


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify