Republican Racism in Montana

So I have written about racism many times, both the "Angry White Man" Republican style of racism, and the "conveniently compassionate" liberal style of racism. Joe Biden seems to be putting his foot in his mouth these days making what sure sound like racist comments about Indian-Americans and Obama, but in his case he seems to just be really stupid about the jokes he makes and he apologizes afterwards. But the "Angry White Man" Republican style of racism seems far worse to me. You get an anti-Semitic pogrom in Delaware, blatantly racist Virginia politicians Virgil Goode, Jerry Kilgore and Bob McDonnell, and recently ousted Senator George Allen, and racism so blatant in Arizona even the national Republican Party abandoned a Congressional candidate.

Racism is a problem everywhere in America, including my own nice little liberal neighborhood of Park Slope, as I have written about before. But it really seems like racism is particularly bad in the Republican Party and often is defended by the Republican Party and their media lap dogs.

The latest example is in Montana. This comes from the Indigenous Democratic Network:

Montana’s Ed Butcher, a Republican state representative, demonstrated once again the persistent racism and racial insensitivity endemic throughout the GOP rank and file. In a recent committee meeting, Butcher derided fellow legislator and a friend of INDN’s List, Democrat representative Jonathan Windy Boy (Chippewa Cree) by referring to the veteran lawmaker as “Chief Windy Boy” and inquiring whether he would wield his vice-chairman’s gavel as a “war club.”

Rep. Butcher dismissed the complaints of lawmakers from both parties, calling the whole matter a “side issue” that represents an “absolutely absurd” attempt by Democrats to play politics. Fellow Indian lawmakers, Reps. Margarett Campbell (Assiniboine) and Shannon Augare (Blackfeet), who are also friends of INDN’s List, deplored Butcher’s insensitive remarks. “Many people in this body don’t know what it is like to feel the effects of racism,” remarked Rep. Campbell to the Native American Times.

Sadly Butcher’s comments were only one in a long line of racist Republican remarks coming out of the Montana circles of power. In 2006, voters proved that bigotry would not be tolerated anymore when they sent serial-racist Sen. Conrad Burns cleaning his D.C. desk. Write Rep. Butcher today (SENATORBUTCHER@aftco.net) and tell him we demand legislators with standards of common decency and mutual respect shared by the overwhelming majority of Americans.

We’re working hard at INDN’s List to fight the racism that pervades the halls of our state capitols by electing Indian legislators. We are building a platform from which Indian voices are heard while promoting the interaction and diversity among our leaders that fosters a spirit of cooperation and tolerance.

While President Bush thinks he’s the decision maker, we at INDN’s List know we’re difference makers. In 2006, INDN’s List endorsed two successful Montana candidates, Norma Bixby (Northern Cheyenne) to the House and Carol Juneau (Hidatsa and Mandan) became the first Indian woman to serve in the Senate. We also strongly supported the unopposed campaigns of Windy Boy, Campbell, and Augare. Our success would not have been possible without your continuing support. Help us retire racists like Rep. Butcher by giving today.

A note to the Republican Party: if you want to appeal to minorities, stop insulting them. Note to Joe Biden: see my note to the Republican Party.


mole333's picture

| | |


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1441 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Words to live by

I of all people should know better. The civil rights movement in the U.S. told women to stop talking about gender issues because first the fight against racism had to be won. The feminist movement frowned at women of colour raising their issues, insisting that first the fight against the patriarchy had to be won. The nationalist movements in Africa insisted that feminism was a corrupt and decadent western import, and that first we had to capture our earthly kingdoms, and achieve our panAfricanist Nirvana, before we started looking at "side issues". And those of us who are interested in our contemporary political dynamics have fallen into the same pit of not tackling the prickly, the uncomfortable questions now: we are waiting to win the larger battle before we clean our house. There is always another battle or another issue, and the matters that matter to the foot soldiers are postponed for yet another day. Yet, these issues ARE the battle. We fight for freedom --and do not imagine we are doing anything less--because it is the freedom to live our lives the way we want, from the jobs we choose to the people we fall in love with. If we cannot tackle them, then we are not equipped to tackle anything. What are the lines of difference we draw? For what do we engage, argue, participate and in some heroes' cases, take awful risks? For what?


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify