Democratic Values: Fiscal Responsibility

One of the most enduring, and most false, myths of the Reagan era is the myth of the fiscally irresponsible Democrat. Republicans try to imply that Democrats waste money and raise taxes. This isn't true in general. Generally Democrats are the more fiscally responsible party because they are more careful in their spending and they are willing to tax where necessary, but only where necessary. In general, the prime example is this graph:

This shows that under REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS (from Reagan on) America runs up huge debts while Democratic Presidents are more fiscally responsible. This gets at something I wrote back when Gerald Ford died: modern Republicans are NOT THE SAME as Eisenhower Republicans and are NOT traditional conservatives. I should note that the stock market also on average does slightly better under Democratic Presidents than Republican Presidents. Correlation or causation? Hard to prove, but the trends are clear.

But the New Hampshire Democratic Party is reminding us that on the state level, Democrats are fiscally responsible. From the New Hampshire Democratic Party:

[DEMOCRATIC] GOV. LYNCH PRESENTS BALANCED, RESPONSIBLE BUDGET

Gov. John Lynch Thursday presented a balanced, honest and fiscally responsible budget that invests in the priorities of the people of New Hampshire--without new taxes.

"This is a budget that uses taxpayer dollars wisely to meet state government?s most fundamental responsibilities: caring for our most vulnerable citizens; educating our children; strengthening our economy; protecting our environment and natural resources; and ensuring the safety of our citizens," Gov. Lynch said this morning as he presented his budget to a joint session of the legislature.

In balancing the budget, Gov. Lynch was faced with the immediate challenge of addressing a $300 million increase in non-discretionary costs. Outside of non-discretionary costs, the budget limits general fund spending growth to 4.15 percent over the two-year budget cycle. The overall growth in the budget in total funds is 7.73 percent.

Gov. Lynch's budget makes major investments in important priorities for New Hampshire--helping keep higher education affordable; providing health insurance for children; helping young people graduate high school; fully funding building aid, catastrophic aid and tuition and transportation aid for local school districts; increasing the number of state troopers; protecting New Hampshire?s natural environment; and replacing federal funding cuts in critical areas.

Click [HERE] to read more about Gov. Lynch's budget, including detailed highlights...

I think the Republican tendency to reward incompetence, wallow in corruption, and give massive tax cuts to the wealthiest of Americans is the reason why Republicans can't balance a budget to save their political lives.


mole333's picture

| | | | |


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1488 guests online.

Online users

We like

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Words to live by

Front-runners are usually focused on racing each other. They often do not realize that when people cannot decide between two leading candidates -- and it doesn't matter whether we are talking about politicians or consumer appliances -- our decision can be subtly swayed by whoever is in third place.

Psychologists call this the decoy effect: In a perfectly rational world, third candidates should only siphon votes away from one or both of the leading contenders. Under no circumstances should they cause the vote share of either front-runner to increase. In the actual world, however, third candidates regularly have the unintended effect of making one of the front-runners look better than before in the minds of undecided voters.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify