 |
|
|
||
Visit our sponsorsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsBuy it!Most EmailedVisit our sponsors |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
| |
Google AdsThe Big Dialog
| ||
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 1510 guests online.
Online users | ||
Instant CongressUpcoming eventsWords to live by
The priest nodded in understanding and went back to his reading. After a while the rabbi asked the priest, "Father, is it still a requirement of your faith that you remain celibate?" The priest replied, "Yes that is still very much a part of our faith." The rabbi then asked him, "Father, have you ever fallen to the temptation of the flesh?" The priest replied, "Yes, rabbi, on one occasion I was weak and broke with my faith." The rabbi nodded understandingly for an moment and then said, "A lot better than pork isn't it?" Subscribe Buttons                    | ||
Agreed
I like having a wide field of good candidates. I think an "inevitability" train will be disasterous, and not because I think Hillary is completely unelectable. I think keeping the voter's interest and making the media have to keep shifting targets is better than ending the suspense too early and giving the media a single, solid target to pour their right wing propoganda on.
Vilsack in particular I liked having in the race. He doesn't suit my tastes, but he would keep the attention of some people who would see Hillary and Obama as too "Hollywood" or something like that.
ANd yet we still have Biden, Mr. "Foot in Mouth" himself.