rwallnerny2007's picture

mole said on attacking

mole said on attacking primary candidates:

"but to attack to a degree that will create lasting animosity and interfere with later cooperation is not really acceptable."

I agree. Unfortunately this site and DG have all too often become sites where you see a lot of unnecessary Hillary bashing. What was the point of Bouldin posting that youtube clip of Hillary as Big Brother from '1984'? To show that you'd have to be mindless zombies to support her? That is something the REPUBLICANS should be expected to post, not democrats. In fact I would bet that the person who made that video probably IS a republican. Hillary is the odds-on to be the Democratic nominee for President. There are valid reasons for not supporting her, but you don't have to insult the many fine progressive/liberal democrats who do support her with stuff like that. What is going to happen is that if she's the presumptive nominee by next spring, and we're all taking to defend her, republicans are going to point to sites like this and all those old posts, "go see what democrats REALLY feel about Hillary" The old hillary-bashing posts here and at DG, particularly those by Michael Bouldin (who still refuses to give a yes/no answer on whether he'd even support her next year if she's the nominee), will become a tool for the republicans.

Why can't we keep debate on our democratic primary candidates civil and not continually put up abrasive videos and pictures of hillary or any of the other candidates. I have attacked Edwards on here on occasion because I have some reservations about him, and like the other candidates better, but I am not surfing the web looking for the nastiest video clips or graphics on him that I can find to post on a site that is supposed to be liberal/progressive and supportive of the Democratic party and its candidates? I don't dislike him that much. In fact I like him. I'd support him. Just as I'd support Hillary or Obama or any of the democratic candidates if they were the nominees. So I have no desire to bash their character.

Do you want this site, middle of next year, to become useless as a conduit for pushing the democratic ticket, because it has two years of posts including by one of the moderators relentlessly bashing the character and electability of the party's nominee? I say lets not take the chance.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1472 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Words to live by

“I just think this is the worst type of governmental meddling. It makes the assumption that students who are attending colleges and universities need to be coddled… that they’re not able to determine right from wrong.”


— Missouri House Minority Leader Jeff Harris, D-Columbia, during debate regarding the "Intellectual Diversity"Bill, HB 213, which would require universities to report to the General Assembly the measures they are taking to insure "intellectual diversity."


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify