This from the gentleman who advocated not worrying about accuracy.

Fine if Clinton has a history of helping Indian Country. And kudos for finding some info on it. But she is also specifically blowing them off now. Obama and Edwards have not responded to date...and I have contacted their campaigns about it...with no reply so far. If silence continues you can bet I will write about it. But to date Hillary is the only one who has specifically told Indian Country they can forget about her participation. THAT is what I was writing about.

My agenda is winning in November 2008. I have no specific primary candidate and I consider Clinton acceptable, though she makes it increasingly hard to support her in the primary. You, on the other hand, have made it clear that you think she should just be annointed, primary be damned. And you brook no criticism of her even when she say's go to hell to the most disenfranchised voters in the nation in favor of wealthier special interests. I have praised all of our candidates when I found it appropriate. I have defended Hillary against some who have attacked her. So give me a fucking break. The criticism is legit and the info accurate.