Agent X's picture

Never forget never forgive

I came upon this blog post while trackbacking from AAPP and I just had to comment.
As a black guy, suffice to say, I see the effects of Republican racist actions every god-damn-day. I could fill this blog with everything they have done and cause a buffer overrun. But, let's just focus with recent history.

You know there's something wrong with a party when they let David Duke be a part of it, AND compound it when he wins a primary and goes on to capture 40% of the vote in a governor's race (In the ever classic 1991 Louisiana race best known as Crook v Racist). But wait, there's more.

Back in 1998, in Jasper Texas, a Mr. Byrd (black man with an arm injury) was dragged to death by 3 white men, including one with white supremacist ties. They were convicted and 2 sentenced to death, but the governor at the time did not sign any hate crimes laws and in fact, opposed such laws. Guess who it was? George W. Bush. But wait, there's more!

Blacks are not the only target. A bigger target is represented by Arabs these days. Just yesterday, presidential candidate Tom Tancredo, who is making his bucks attacking illegals, now is on record (talk radio) as saying that he would "If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina," This he said he would do in response to a domestic nuclear attack. You don't have to be a military or political expert to know how wrongheaded that statement really is. Unfortunately, statements like this are really common in the Republican party's 2008 candidates.
"I would double Guantanamo" Mitt Romney.
Guiliani has a known racist and Confederate sympathizers in his South Carolina operation, ie. Arthur Ravenel Sr.
Ron Paul talked crap about black male residents of Washington DC, though on the plus side, that is about it for him.
Mike Huckabee is gung-ho for the Iraq War, including stating that opposition to the surge is dangerous. Well, what about all those dead Iraqis that got killed because of the surge?
Duncan Hunter supports the Minutemen project, a project which may not have overt racist components, you can best believe there are covert racists components and agendas present.
Fred Thompson supports the current policies of Free Trade and Globalization, whose effects are literally killing black and brown and Asian people all over the world and a leading cause of illegal immigration. Also a (crappy) Nixon crony.

I could go on and on, but I'm sleepy now.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1066 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Sometimes I want to scream.
I’d like to say, “From now on, hats can be left on in the building, and food is welcome in all classrooms. Now, can we just move on, for Pete’s sake?”
But I don’t. . .

We’re arguing about power. About consistency. About priorities. We’re trying to discuss the Big Issues, but we’re afraid to name them.
So we bicker about minutiae.

We fall into the safe arguments that no one will ever win but that will surely fill the time allotted, ensuring that we can return to our classrooms, departments, and homes. . .

If we’re actually going to talk about why kids need to eat in class, then we may have to break the silence surrounding the issues of poverty and inequity.

We don’t really want to
do that. We prefer to stay safely ensconced in our ignorance, putting mountains of energy into talking about nothing at all. . .

(So) kids stay hungry, continue to lack basic
supplies, and, most important, fail to get a sense of what it is to recognize and be able to use their power as citizens. They don’t learn how it feels to exercise power wisely because we refuse to show them.

They learn to pour their energies into petty battles rather than real civic engagement.

In this era of increasing political partisanship, isn’t it time for us to teach our students that looking deeply into the well of our own shortcomings is the way to solve them? How long will we maintain the charade of infallibility, our blameless collective personae?

The greatest gift we can give our students, and ourselves, is the acknowledgment that things aren’t OK — and won’t be OK, even if we build a school in which no one wears a hat indoors, everyone has a pencil, and neither Snickers bars nor apple cores can be found outside the cafeteria.


— LAURA THOMAS, Antioch Center for School Renewal director and core graduate faculty member, Keene, New Hampshire - Editorial Projects in Education, Vol. 17, Issue 02, Pages 50,53-54.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify