Recipe: George Washington's Eggnog (with modifications)

This eggnog recipe is supposedly from George Washington's day according to many websites (e.g. here). I include some modifications. This was a big hit at my department's recent happy hour even though we weren't able to age it more than 3 days.

Ingredients:

* 1 cup brandy (I used somewhat more)
* 1/2 cup sherry (I used port instead and might try madeira if I tried it again)
* 1/2 cup dark rum
* 1/2 cup whiskey (I used bourbon)
* 12 eggs, separated
* 3/4 cup white sugar
* 1 quart whole milk
* 1 quart heavy cream
* 1 quart vanilla bean ice cream
* 1 tablespoon freshly grated ground nutmeg

Instructions:

1. Mix the brandy, sherry, rum, and whiskey into a bowl. (I used port instead of sherry and I added a extra brandy...Madiera is something else I might try instead of sherry)

2. Separate egg yolks and whites into separate mixing bowls.

3. Beat egg yolks until light and frothy. Gradually beat in the sugar then the booze mixture. Next beat in the milk and heavy cream until thoroughly blended.

4. Using a clean beater, beat the egg whites until soft peaks form. Gently fold the egg whites into the yoly/sugar/booze/milk mixture.

5. Ideally you should age in the Refrigerater for 5 to 10 days. When I made it we only had 3 days to age it. Shake the container occasionally to keep the alcohol from separating.

6. To serve, pour the eggnog into a punch bowl. Whisk to blend milk mixture, add the vanilla ice cream (allowing it to gradually melt into the mix), and garnish with nutmeg.


mole333's picture

| |

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 1230 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Obama sketched out a different theory of social change than the one Clinton had implied earlier in the evening. Instead of relying on a president who fights for those who feel invisible, Obama, in the climactic passage of his speech, described how change bubbles from the bottom-up: “And because that somebody stood up, a few more stood up. And then a few thousand stood up. And then a few million stood up. And standing up, with courage and clear purpose, they somehow managed to change the world!”

For people raised on Jane Jacobs, who emphasized how a spontaneous dynamic order could emerge from thousands of individual decisions, this is a persuasive way of seeing the world. For young people who have grown up on Facebook, YouTube, open-source software and an array of decentralized networks, this is a compelling theory of how change happens.

Clinton had sounded like a traditional executive, as someone who gathers the experts, forges a policy, fights the opposition, bears the burdens of power, negotiates the deal and, in crisis, makes the decision at 3 o’clock in the morning.

But Obama sounded like a cross between a social activist and a flannel-shirted software C.E.O. — as a nonhierarchical, collaborative leader who can inspire autonomous individuals to cooperate for the sake of common concerns.

Clinton had sounded like Old Politics, but Obama created a vision of New Politics. And the past several months have revolved around the choice he framed there that night. Some people are enthralled by the New Politics, and we see their vapors every day. Others think it is a mirage and a delusion. There’s only one politics, and, tragically, it’s the old kind, filled with conflict and bad choices.


— David Brooks, A Defining Moment


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify