 |
|
|
||
Visit our sponsorsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsBuy it!Most EmailedVisit our sponsors |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
| |
Google AdsThe Big Dialog
| ||
Who's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 1156 guests online.
Online users | ||
Instant CongressUpcoming eventsWords to live byThe way to fight this 'moving forward' frame is not to repeat it--that's the first step. The problem is, Americans want to talk about and correct all the problems the President created and we are in right now. And if we talk about 'moving forward' and looking up the road and turning points--we get distracted from the present. To reframe, we should force the debate to use a new phrase: This phrase focuses the discussion in Iraq, on immigration policy, on oil policy, on hurricane preparedness--focuses attention on the real concern: a government that fails to act in the face of huge problems. Subscribe Buttons                    | ||
re:VOTING IN OREGON: The 2008 Democratic Primary
“Voters are supposed to take seriously the claim that neither Merkley nor his campaign authorized the ads,” the Register-Guard in Eugene said on Saturday. “Maybe the ads' producers found a twin brother that Merkley never knew about, or perhaps both the campaign and the candidate are taking the summer off. Otherwise, the disclaimer is laughable.”
---------------
Rahman
Oregon Treatment Centers