
A priest and a rabbi were travelling on a plane. After a while the priest turned to the rabbi and asked, "Is it still a requirement of your faith that you not eat pork?" The rabbi responded, "Yes, that is still one of our beliefs". The priest then asked, "Have you ever eaten pork?" To which the rabbi replied, "Yes, on one occasion I did succumb and tasted pork."
The priest nodded in understanding and went back to his reading.
After a while the rabbi asked the priest, "Father, is it still a requirement of your faith that you remain celibate?" The priest replied, "Yes that is still very much a part of our faith." The rabbi then asked him, "Father, have you ever fallen to the temptation of the flesh?" The priest replied, "Yes, rabbi, on one occasion I was weak and broke with my faith."
The rabbi nodded understandingly for an moment and then said, "A lot better than pork isn't it?"
The media has repeated
The media has repeated Clinton rhetoric from the beginning without questioning it (can we say 35 years of experience?). Of course, she just means that she needs more delegates. Clinton has consistently said that Obama's wins don't count because the states he won are red states. Well, what about territories that don't have electoral votes? How can they now count following her previous logic?
It was almost certain that Clinton was going to win Guam but I heard almost no mention from mainstream media when Obama ended up winning there. While Puerto Rico, Guam, the District of Columbia, etc. do matter in the Democratic Party, no one should be talking about popular votes because the popular vote does not matter - only electoral votes.