THE MESSAGE: It's STILL the Economy, Stupid!

It's STILL the Economy, Stupid!

That was the T-shirt I wore last night to a meeting of my local Democratic club, the Independent Neighborhood Democrats (IND). It proved to be a very appropriate shirt.

Last night, IND had a guest speaker, Hank Sheinkopf, political consultant, formerly a member of President Clinton’s re-election media team, and panelist on a local TV station's roundtable discussion. Sheinkopf is the ultimate Democratic insider and he came to discuss the 2006 election victory with us.

Sheinkopf's initial message was that we did not win this year because of ourselves, but rather because the Republicans had crashed and burned. We won because the Republicans were so corrupt, had lied so much and had, in essence, lost the confidence of the voters. His warning was this: unless we return to the populist economic message that is the HEART of the Democratic Party, we will lose again.

Sheinkopf has his own agenda: he is pushing for Hillary Clinton for President. But, that and a few other disagreements aside, I agreed with him just about completely.

The core of his talk was that Democrats need to focus on just one message, and it was the message that ALWAYS works for Democrats since the 1920's: economic populism. Actually, I would use the term "progressivism" because that is how Theodore Roosevelt described it when it was Republicans who were the economic populists. But economic populism is a good term for it as well.

It's STILL the economy, stupid! That's the message.

Sheinkopf argues that it is the blue-collar vote that determines national elections. He narrowed it down to 500,000 white, male Catholics...but I suspect that you could use other groups as the key demographic as well. This group is often socially conservative, but when faced with bread and butter issues, they vote for economic populism. They will only buy into the wedge issues Republicans run on if they don't see the Democrats offering them economic populism.

Raise the minimum wage. Make education more affordable for working class Americans. Jobs. Fiscal responsibility. THOSE are the issues that Democrats MUST focus on to win. And I completely agree with Sheinkopf on this. Democrats have ALWAYS been better on economic issues, presiding over better job prospects, better stock performance and lower deficits than the Republicans. That is our strength and that is what we ignore at our peril.

The Iraq war is a major issue right now. Republican corruption is a major issue right now. But right now is not 2008. They may still be issues in 2008, but what we KNOW is that economic populism is ALWAYS a good strategy for Democrats.

Sheinkopf believes Hillary Clinton WILL be the Democratic nominee in 2008, believes that she WILL run on an economic populist message (and I bet he wants to be the one to craft that message), and believes that 2008, and most years, come down to four states: Missouri, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. He thinks Hillary has a very good shot at winning the presidency and points to her good performance in upstate as evidence since upstate has a similar demographics to the four states he considers key to a Democratic victory. He disagrees with Dean's 50-state strategy, and I think he is wrong about that. He feels the South is irrelevant to the Democrats below Missouri, and I think he is wrong about that, particularly given the strength of politicians from those states (Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Edwards, Jim Webb, Mark Warner...). But I do think he is right that those four states are critical and that an economic populist/traditionally progressive message will play very well in those states. They have played well in Indiana and Montana recently, so let's expand that message and make it our Congressional agenda. Even if we want a 50-state rather than 4-state strategy, the same message will carry us.

Iraq
Minimum wage
Addressing income inequalities
Education

Those were the top four issues Sheinkopf advocates we focus on. I could add to that list...but it is a good starting point. And it agrees with many of the points I have made when I advocated a particular agenda for the Democratic Congress. I will expand upon my recommended agenda, inspired by Sheinkopf, in the future. For now it is simply remembering the message and starting with the four points above.

I had almost stopped wearing my "It's STILL the Economy, Stupid" t-shirt. But three things make it still relevant today. First, it is the liberal shirt I own that almost universally gets a positive reaction: a chuckle, a laugh or a shake of the head and a "you got THAT right." Second, as economists are warning of a new recession (did we ever really leave the LAST recession) as well as continuing threat of inflation, a combination we used to call "stagflation," it really IS the economy that is the #1 issue. And third, being reminded by Sheinkopf that this is the message that consistently wins elections for Democrats makes me prouder than ever of that t-shirt.

Start saying it now and keep saying it until 2008, every day: It's STILL the economy, stupid.


mole333's picture

| | | | | | |

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see interwiki.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 1437 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

Obama sketched out a different theory of social change than the one Clinton had implied earlier in the evening. Instead of relying on a president who fights for those who feel invisible, Obama, in the climactic passage of his speech, described how change bubbles from the bottom-up: “And because that somebody stood up, a few more stood up. And then a few thousand stood up. And then a few million stood up. And standing up, with courage and clear purpose, they somehow managed to change the world!”

For people raised on Jane Jacobs, who emphasized how a spontaneous dynamic order could emerge from thousands of individual decisions, this is a persuasive way of seeing the world. For young people who have grown up on Facebook, YouTube, open-source software and an array of decentralized networks, this is a compelling theory of how change happens.

Clinton had sounded like a traditional executive, as someone who gathers the experts, forges a policy, fights the opposition, bears the burdens of power, negotiates the deal and, in crisis, makes the decision at 3 o’clock in the morning.

But Obama sounded like a cross between a social activist and a flannel-shirted software C.E.O. — as a nonhierarchical, collaborative leader who can inspire autonomous individuals to cooperate for the sake of common concerns.

Clinton had sounded like Old Politics, but Obama created a vision of New Politics. And the past several months have revolved around the choice he framed there that night. Some people are enthralled by the New Politics, and we see their vapors every day. Others think it is a mirage and a delusion. There’s only one politics, and, tragically, it’s the old kind, filled with conflict and bad choices.


— David Brooks, A Defining Moment


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify