 |
|
|
||
Visit our sponsorsUpcoming eventsFill up our coffee fundBlogAdsBuy it!Most EmailedVisit our sponsors |
Get our Digestifs du jourNibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.
culturekitchensThe Publisher Daily servings of political dissent Grassroots News and Feminist Bloggers A new kind of vouyerism Art + Code + Philosophy Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP. Hot Topics
Member's articles and stories
Recent reviews
| |
Google AdsThe Big Dialog
| ||
Instant CongressWords to live by"I believe in the separation of church and state.... We all have our own religious beliefs. There are people out there who are atheists, who don't believe at all.... They are all citizens of Minnesota and I have to respect that." Subscribe Buttons                    | ||
So I take it this is not yours
I am going to focus at the moment on how you posted this because this is the "Editorial Clinic" forum
I like the article. Since we try to focus on original content for the what could be helpful is a small intro to the book if you have read it. It doesn't have to be lenghty. What's important is your POV :
Why do you think this is worth reading?
What hooked you?
Who is the author?
What have they written before?
You answer all those questions and that's enough for pushing this to the front page as a review. You have give it from 1 to 5 stars.
The way I want to see stuff like this posted is :
-- In the Front page teaser:
QUick review, maybe with image
divided by
<!--break-->Then, after the jump, the whole article enclosed in
<blockquote></blockquote>tags.Does that make sense?