Capitalism
- (1) |
- 1 (11) |
- 2 (461) |
- 4 (1) |
- 5 (2) |
- 9 (17) |
- A (1547) |
- B (1157) |
- C (1884) |
- D (1003) |
- E (1253) |
- F (807) |
- G (722) |
- H (1017) |
- I (1020) |
- J (508) |
- K (114) |
- L (621) |
- M (1174) |
- N (608) |
- O (249) |
- P (2002) |
- Q (53) |
- R (1299) |
- S (1204) |
- T (770) |
- U (259) |
- V (404) |
- W (628) |
- x (3) |
- Y (39) |
- Z (14) |
Upsetting thought of the day

So let me get this straight : The US had 750 billion dollars to bail out Wall Street; a sector of the US economy which has been historically controlled by "white" or US Americans of European ascendancy. The US Congress found 750 billion dollars for them and their European and Asian investors. A bailout, by the way, that now said banks are pooh-poohing, lest the US Treasury and tax-payers find out the depths of their accounting infamies. Yet there's no money to pay back reparations to African Americans for the evils of slavery and Jim Crow laws?
Discuss.
[A scene from the movie Birth of a Nation (1915). Image found in Wikipedia under "Lynching in America")
Abuse of Power | Africa | Banking | Business | Capitalism | Economics | Money | Race Relations | Racial Bias | Racism | Wall Street Bailout | White Supremacy | World Economy
It's 9/11 all over again (in Wall Street)
The other day, while researching images of the 9/11 devastation, I came across this image of the entrance of the World Financial Center.
All I could think of while looking at this photograph was "this is what they (Bush, Paulson, Bernanke) are doing to us all over again. Only this time they have no terrorists to blame, just sinister market forces.
My other thought was, and is that capitalism is ultimately violent and destructive.
Banner Posts | Capitalism | Destruction | Finance | greed | Markets | Violence | 9/11 | Ben Bernanke | George Bush | Henry (Hank) Paulson | New York City | Wall Street | World Financial Center
Still Time (to Form a Circle)
AS I'VE WRITTEN BEFORE, I had the lie of Age=Authority shown to me early in life. Whether it was the peer beat-downs that sometimes found me due to my being a tiny kid; the police occasionally appearing as adversaries to my family or their friends; the rebellious music I grew up hearing; the fact that my caretakers were at times drastically incompetent or hostile or both; or certain teachers displaying inappropriate stupidity, immaturity, or outright aggression—I labored under no belief that big people were infallible or expert.
I moved around. A lot. In some places, I found that this skepticism was not necessarily the norm in my peer groups. Some friends (most, in some areas) seemed to have kneejerk reactions to authority, be it teacher, priest, police, or parent. That reaction was to publicly obey, even to fear, to reflexively genuflect. Regardless of what the friend said, felt, or did in private. I did not, at least, suffer that contradiction. Perhaps that is unfortunate...and yet in the world I've known, it was best. Either way, it eventually labeled me as insubordinate, rebellious, and trouble. But what is a child to do in the face of fake and often-harmful authority—but rage?
The realization hit me over and over, though. I think we have a sense built in, a sense that expects the aged to know more. It would stand to reason. Biologically sound. Perpetuates necessary bonds and perhaps life-saving obeisance to caretakers.
Our first systems of hierarchy are probably age. Kids boast of a quarter-year seniority on each other, and it means all the world, and none of them argue the standard of measurement. It makes sense. Because even one day in a life can add an unmeasurable amount of wisdom. Should we choose to take it.
That's the thing. That's what rose up and hit me again. Even with all I had learned about authority figures, I was stunned later to realize how many adults remained as children. And I don't mean childlike. I mean childish.
Ageism | authority | Capitalism | Children | culture of youth | John McCain | lessons | materialism | respect | shortcut | Spirituality
Afghani girl for sale at The New York Times

Ugh.
If there ever was a big media juxtapotion of capitalist imperialism and mysogyny this has got to be the one.
This particular portrait haunts me. Not because there is anything wrong with the girl, but because there is everything wrong with making her a piece of exotica.
She may elicit comparisons with the madonnas of the Renaissance; but I feel our Afghani girl was shot to look more like a pre-Raphaelite painting. Check out especially the ladies created by Dante Gabriel Rossetti.
With their dreams of brotherhoods, medievalist fantasies and nymph fetish, the pre-Raphaelites artists can be considered one of the most anti-women aesthetic movements of European. I would like to make the point that it is particularly mysogynist exactly because their style was meant to represent women as precious objects.
So when I look at this ironic juxtaposition at The New York Times, I read it not just as a joke. Looking at it closely it speaks volumes about the way in which Americans not only regard women but 'foreign' or colored women.
Call it the Pier 1 Imports effect.
Anything that is not the 'mainstream' American culture or looks like is treated by the purveyors of 'haute taste' as a commodity, as another tradeable piece of furniture or accessory of interior decor.
Big Media | Capitalism | Copyright | Empire | Humor | Irony | Mass Media | Mysogyny | The New York Time
Afghani girl for sale at The New York Times
Submitted by liza on 30 May 2007 - 11:18am.Popular Culture | Capitalism | Empire | Humor | Mass Media | Mysogyny | New York Times
Seminolehattan, anyone?

We're going to buy Manhattan back one hamburger at a time.
Capitalism | First Nations | Gambling | native americans | Hard Rock Cafe | Seminole Nation























