carbon emissions

  •  (1) |
  • 1 (11) |
  • 2 (402) |
  • 4 (1) |
  • 5 (2) |
  • 9 (15) |
  • A (1521) |
  • B (1085) |
  • C (1819) |
  • D (969) |
  • E (1200) |
  • F (765) |
  • G (698) |
  • H (976) |
  • I (996) |
  • J (461) |
  • K (107) |
  • L (611) |
  • M (1138) |
  • N (589) |
  • O (240) |
  • P (1946) |
  • Q (51) |
  • R (1212) |
  • S (1136) |
  • T (740) |
  • U (239) |
  • V (363) |
  • W (565) |
  • x (3) |
  • Y (39) |
  • Z (14) |

NYC Among Best in the Nation on Greenhoue Gasses

In many ways NYC is a big mess. I thought that when I first moved here and I still think that. But both then and now I always recognized that NYC, in its own haphazard ways, sometimes gets it right.

Let's talk some greenhouse gas numbers. The United States is the single largest contributor to global warming. With only 5% of the earth's population we contribute 25% of the human-contributed greenhouse emissions. Per capita that pretty much sucks. Those conservatives who want to say population growth and China are the worst of the problem have to explain those numbers. Not that population growth and China aren't PART of the problem, but the USA is the biggest part of the problem.

According to Salon.com, NYC by itself contributes nearly 1% of America's emissions, making NYC an equivalent contributor to Ireland or Portugal.

Sounds bad, right? A single city contributing 1% of America's entire global emissions or .25% of the emissions of all humans on earth. But then you realize that NYC contains 2.7% of America's population. We in NYC produce only a little more than a third of the emissions as the average American.

So what are we doing right? Well, DUH! We have a mass transit system! Yes it's a chaotic, dirty mess, but it means we don't drive nearly as much as everyone else.

In the not too distant future I want to be working with our local Brooklyn New Democratic Majority group to host a series of talks on a "Green NYC." Among the topics I want to cover is how each individual residential building in NYC (or ANY city, for that matter) can reduce its carbon emissions and energy usage and save money in the process. This is an idea that is precolating among several minds in the city and may, within a few years, start to become mainstream. Let me use this as a chance to ask if anyone out there is interested in speaking in this series. Obviously you would have to be able to come to NYC to speak. We already have a couple of possible speakers and slots will be limited. Meetings are the second Thursday of every month, 7 PM at the Ozzie's on 5th Ave. and Garfield in Park Slope, Brooklyn. Not all meetings will cover "Green NYC," so again, slots will be limited. If we start intentionally greening NYC, we can save money for ourselves, reduce the pressure on the grid at peak times, thus reducing the risk of blackouts, and FURTHER reduce our per capita carbon emissions.


mole333's picture

| | | |

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1010 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

The quality of being genuine is hard to convey, and deciding who should be president based solely on that basis can lead to disaster; you need brains and an ability to go with the flow as well. But voters know a phony above all and Romney came off as one from the get-go. Over the last decade he had changed his views in a rightward direction on so many issues to suit what he thought he needed to win the GOP nomination that he ended up standing for nothing but his own ambition.

[...]

It's no accident that the GOP race is down to three men who are clear about who they are: McCain, Huckabee and, yes, Ron Paul.


— Howard Fineman in Burying Mitt.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify