An Open Letter to Michael Bouldin on the "F" Word and the "P" Word
[EDITOR'S NOTE: It should be made clear to anyone reading this that Mr. Holland, who is so primly lecturing on appropriate speech, has openly advocated that Elizabeth Edwards should die so that Hillary Clinton can be annointed president. I should note that Hillary's campaign is not so thrilled with this kind of advocacy and our readership was overwhelmingly disgusted by several of Mr. Holland's posts, most particularly his advocacy of Elizabeth Edwards' death. So, as you read this, keep this in mind. I have edited Mr. Holland's tags to indicate this.]
##
Cross-posted at the Francis L. Holland Blog.
"Many Black men and women who respect themselves and respect their readers simply don't use four-letter vulgarities in their writing, as a rule."
Michael, although there are more than 200 posts at my blog over three months, and many more comments, if you search for the "F" word, you will discover that YOU, Michael, are the only person who has EVER used that word at my blog. This was in the context of a comment you wrote defending the radical atheist and anti-religious agenda of many white atheist/agnostic "progressives" whitosphere blogs.
You see, many Black men and women who respect themselves and respect their readers simply don't use four-letter vulgarity in their writing, as a rule.
You, on the other hand, use the word "pimp" (the "P" word) and the "F" word constantly. You insist on using four letter words and other offensive vulgarity even when it is entirely unnecessary and completely inappropriate.
So, you see, Michael, there is a fundamental difference between your constant insensitivity and the professional sensibility that you will find at many blogs in the Afrosphere. We in the Afrosphere many of us understand that 35% of Black people go to church at least once a week (according to the Pew Research Centers) and those people will NOT return to a blog that is full of filthy four-letter words.
An symbol of the Afrosphere.
It is not that none of us ever use these words in verbal conversation, but many of us rarely if ever do in social contexts where filthy four-letter words like the "P" word you use so frequently are certain to offend others if used in reference to our readers. For example, one of the regular readers at my site is the author of the Asabagna blog. He is a committed church-going Christian whose site expresses his religious foundations. I have searched his Asabagna site and I cannot find a single instance in which he has used the “F†word. I also searched for the "F" at another highly respected Blackosphere site, the Field Negro blog. I could not find a single instance of that word spelled out at the Field Negro blog. At Exodus Mentality, another highly-respected Afrosphere blog, I searched and could not find a single instance of the "F" word being used to intentionally offend another participant.
From this, I draw the conclusion that if I or others constantly used the “F†word at my site, Asabagna or readers like him might well be offended or might conclude that we did not respect ourselves and others enough to be worthy of his time, and so he might stop visiting my site. Out of respect for Asabagna and others like him (e.g. 35% of Black people who go to church each Sunday), I refrain from using the “F†word (even if I might have occasionally used it in another social context where I knew that no one present would be offended).
This is because I understand that successful social interaction requires an understanding of "registers", which are the different vocabularies and modes of expression that we use according to the various social contexts in which we participate. Part of growing up is realizing that not all words are appropriate in all contexts. Our use of language must be informed not only by what offends us, but also by what clearly offends other people.
When you use the “F†word in this post and three times in that other post, it becomes clear to my readers that you do not respect them. And that’s why I don’t censor your posts. As far as I am concerned, you are your own worst advocate. If your concern is receiving more site traffic at Culture Kitchen, you could do far more to achieve that goal by stopping the use of vulgarities like the “F†word and the “P†word than by forbidding readers to post links to others sites.
Some of Liza Sabater’s own relatives, particularly any Catholic ones and any older mature adult ones, may not be reading her site simply because you, Michael, use filthy words so often.
As you say, you may well participate in the Culture Kitchen site that also has a prominent Black woman in its governance, but as far as I am concerned you are a perfect example of why the whitosphere has so few Black participants. You, Michael, refuse to control your filthy language even when others specifically tell you that they find your language to be intentionally offensive to significant sectors of your potential audience.
Michael, please refrain from using the "F" word and the "P" word and other four-letter words at my blog to offend others, because every time you use these words you show a profound disrepect for a significant and highly valued segment of readers in the Blackosphere.
Best practices | WTFIYP? | Bloviating | Concern Troll | Hypocricy | francislholland | Michael Bouldin
Hahaha!
Yeah, whatever, Polly Prissypants. Oooh, I'm so offended. Oooh, your big spear scares me so. Show me your big spear, dude; trying to intimidate/titillate the gay boy with your phallic symbols? What is that, your three mighty inches?
Snort.
Of Spears and Axes
Wasn't Holland one of the ones who complained about finding my axe picture intimidating? Is this yet another example of blatant hypocricy by the Royalist? Spears good, axes bad. Advocating Jihad for a Royalist cause good, crude references to the act of sexual intercourse bad.
Language and Symbols
I wish that the recent debate over Imus could convince other white men that offensive language is potentially devastating to credibility and careers. But some people are so unreconstructed and recalcitrant that NOTHING seems to be able to make them reconsider their obtuse blindness.
Have you axes and your hate speech! Just like I don't visit Klan rallies, I don't open any pages where I think I'm going to see symbols that remind me of the Confederate flag. This is why the blogosphere is divided into the whitosphere, the Afrosphere and the other flags. Some people actually LIKE blog apartheid, and they show it in their every word and deed.
What a load of crap
Wow...you ignore so many things here in your attempt to criticize the site that has been called by some black bloggers as "the site to go to if you want to discuss race."
First off, the main person around here using the words you are so offended by and try to use to paint this site as somehow racist, is Liza...our publisher and a Puerto Rican woman. Are you calling her a white man? Or are you, as she suggests, afraid to confront her, so instead you blame Michael and me...and I don't even use words like "pimp" or "ho" or whatever. I may curse, but I never picked up on the faux black lingo many white hipsters picked up on. So somehow you attack me, who doesn't use those words, but not Liza who does. Do her 32D's frighten you? Is a strong woman threatening to your manhood? Why else would you avoid confronting her for her use of these words but confront me.
As to the axe...this from the man who advocates displaying a spear on sites run by blacks? I have no problem with your phallic symbol advocacy, but saying a picture of someone in a costume holding an axe is unacceptable but your use of a spear as a symbol is okay is, quite simply, hypicritical.
The blogsphere has its divisions. Oddly, you are attacking culture kictchen, one of the few sites where such a divide doesn't exist. Run by a Puerto Rican woman, our featured writers include blacks (including a Nigerian) and Hispanics, our readers include every ethnicity, and our articles directly deal with racial and ethnic issues almost on a daily basis. I have been criticized by wealthy whites for talking about race, but until you came along minorities reading my stuff would thank me for bringing up issues that are usually taboo for white bloggers.
And the Klan and the confederate flag? Is that somehow supposed to suggest Culture Kitchen is equivalent to the Klan or you think we might start displaying the confederate flag? Sheesh! The top of our page displays "Moletov Man," a revolutionary Nicaraguan. Yet somehow you equate THAT with the Confederate Flag????
You are seriously deluded, my friend.
How about we show
some friggin' respect for the 65%? Those of us who have real issues to try to figure out and know how to consult Miss Manners if we need etiquette lessons.
Nance
Second that
and just say the word, Nance, I'll send MisEducation around too. ;-)



































Excuse me...
Mr. Holland, you have no right to lecture ANYONE on sensitivity. You voluntarily surrendered that right when you advocated the death of Elizabeth Edwards as an act of God so that Holy Hillary can be annointed Queen. How dare you lecture ANYONE on senistivity or appropriate speech. I can tell you from comments received by the editors here, YOU have offended far more people than Michael has. People find Pat Robertson style calling upon god to smite people more offensive than the use of the "F" word.
Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. And you, my friend, built yourself one fragile glass house when you announced to the world your Jihadist views of Elizabeth Edwards' cancer. And now you are throwing stones.
You, sir, are one of the biggest hypocrites I know. Clean up your own method of dialogue before you presume to lecture people. Particularly since it really seems like we have a much larger and more diverse audience than you have, so I can only imagine we are doing something right. Perhaps some of our use of curse words may alienate some. But I think far more are alienated by the curses you call down upon those you see as standing in the way of Hillary's divine right to rule. That is why even your best posts get little positive attention around here. Some deserve more attention than they get...but your complete alienation of our entire readership means no one is going to view what you write positively. By contrast, some who have been the biggest targets of Michael's sharp tongue have become friends. So I think your lecture is pompous and hypocritical. But that is no surprise.