Loving not Driving

I haven’t owned a car since 2003, and it's a tremendous relief. I no longer receive parking tickets or speeding tickets, don't have to control the temptation to drive like a lunatic. (I was a road rager if there ever was one.) Each month, I need not concern myself with car payments, insurance payments or maintenance payments.

Having moved to Brazil, the dreaded task of removing snow and ice from a car windshield is not only in my past, but it is inconceivable to those in my present.

The alternatives to driving have become much more attractive to me. Having moved to within a five minute walk of the ocean, I no longer need to spend ten dollars of gas and two hours of driving to reach the Jersey Shore. I just walk.

Because the nearest shopping mall is eight hours away, the ritual of endeavoring to earn more and more money to drive to the mall and invent new ways to spend it is much deemphasized. No more shopping mall parking lots for me! Less is more.

In Brazil, there are buses that reliably take passengers to most anywhere we might want to go, no matter how remote. So, when I want to go to a beach further up the coast, I just wait at a bus stop on this beach for a bus to that other beach. Unlike in the United States, the buses in urban areas here typically run twenty-four hours per day, which makes them a viable alternative, even for nocturnal people who like, sometimes, to party all night.

And party they do at the clubs along the coast here, where over a thousand people can be found girating to Pagode and Axé music, watching a choreographed dance show on stage, on any give day or night. And all without cars, for the most part.

Sometimes, I imagine what Brazil would be like if it had a car culture. Here, there are quaint little country roads that run along the Atlantic coast, where one can always descend from the bus and drink chilled coconut water from the coconut, with the waves lapping at one's feet along a sandy beach. But in the United States, the coastline is dominated by four-lane highways, with concrete bridges and honking horns passing twenty yards above oily and polluted streams and estuaries, a filthy open garbage dump nearly the length of a nation. A relatively small population creates a quarter of the world's pollution.

Without the intense car culture, many Brazilians live at the ocean, catching fish in streams and estuaries just by casting in a hand-net and pulling it back full of lunch. (One morning on the beach at sunrise, I saw an Indian walk to the water, cast a net and immediately haul it in, with two large blue fish inside, with the vast simplicity of a Frenchman walking home with a loaf of bread under his arm.)

I travel often by bus here. I enter and pay my fare and look for a seat, all the while glancing into the eyes of up to seventy other passengers and wondering about their lives. I remark to myself how much faster our tropical paradise would be degraded if all of these seventy Brazilians went to the beach in 35 cars, with 35 motors, 280 internal combustion cylinders and 70 dual exhaust pipes, instead of all traveling in one bus with one engine.

Communal travel is so obvious a solution to global warming that Americans will never be willing to adopt it. Instead, we turn America into a large and winding three-dimensional parking lot, where we spend hours and hours just a few feet from thousands of people with whom we will never communicate, except to flip them the bird.

For many where I live now, the morning commute is by bicycle, along the same beaches at which we swim on weekends, and all without warming the planet or filling the sky with eight cylinder sport-utility smog. A city not dependent on cars is dramatically different from one that is car-dependent.

I’m a computer junkie and I admit it. Within a ten minute walk from my house, there are a dozen Internet cafes and six computer stores, all accessible without driving a car or even taking a bus. If most people drove cars here, entrepreneurs would surely build stores fifteen minutes away by car (two days on foot), and we would warm the planet driving to that which could just as easily have been built next door to us. Cars are expensive, and many of us are much richer as a result of our relative poverty.

I was made for Brazil’s culture. Even before I moved here, I loved to walk miles at a time, exploring my environs on foot for that new soul-food restaurant, park or enormous shade tree that I never would have noticed had I driven by at 60 miles per hour. When I dated, I led my women friends on long walks up and down the Charles River, from Boston to Cambridge and back again. Only the strong survived.

And now, in Brazil, when I reflect on my peak moments of the last year, the best of all came during a five-hour nature walk, led by Arí, an Indian guide and friend, among cliffs overlooking the Atlantic ocean, with ten miles of pristine beaches visible to the north and south, and vistas of Africa imaginable to the east, across an immenseness of bright blue ocean.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Arí is blessed to live on the ocean and make his living guiding tourists along one of the most beautiful seascapes imaginable.

On foot in the tropics, precisely because there are so few cars and shopping malls, one can look up at the clouds and see dragons and elephants among them, drifting into millions of bright nighttime stars, instead of smoke stacks and telephone wires. I’m glad I don’t own a car and I'm glad I don’t need one.


francislholland's picture

| | | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mole333's picture

Curious

Where in Brazil do you live. I have heard some detail about the city planning of Sao Paulo and have heard that it is precisely designed as a car culture city where pedestrians can barely walk safely because no one ever planned for pedestrians. Can't remember where I saw it but it was a program on city planning. Of course Sao Paulo might be atypical. And I have read about another city in Brazil...can't remember the name, but it began with a "C" I think...which is planned precisely the opposite: mass transit, very green. Big country and many different people and places, so I am sure there are many cultures.

I never drove routinely, even when I lived in Los Angeles. Biked and bused everywhere, though in LA there are some places you can't get to without about 3 hours on the bus. Biked 5 miles each way to work most days, took the bus otherwise. In Kyoto walked or biked, occasional rapid transit. Traveling in Japan you can reach almost anywhere by train...though one place, Takachiho on Kyushu, I needed a bus. LOVED being able to hop a train anywhere. New York City is, of course, home to a messy rapid transit system I kind of hate but have to admit it makes it possible to get almost anywhere without a car. Barely ever take a bus in NYC, only train, but there is a whole extra layer of rapid transit in the bus. We only use a car when we travel and we try to rent a hybrid when we do. One time, when we visited Los Angeles, we rented an electric car and LOVED it.


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 2230 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by


These new-found tensions which are present at all stages in the real nature of colonialism have their repercussions on the cultural plane. In literature, for example, there is relative over-production. From being a reply on a minor scale to the dominating power, the literature produced by natives becomes differentiated and makes itself into a will to particularism. The intelligentsia, which during the period of repression was essentially a consuming public, now themselves become producers. This literature at first chooses to confine itself to the tragic and poetic style; but later on novels, short stories and essays are attempted. It is as if a kind of internal organisation or law of expression existed which wills that poetic expression become less frequent in proportion as the objectives and the methods of the struggle for liberation become more precise. Themes are completely altered; in fact, we find less and less of bitter, hopeless recrimination and less also of that violent, resounding, florid writing which on the whole serves to reassure the occupying power. The colonialists have in former times encouraged these modes of expression and made their existence possible. Stinging denunciations, the exposing of distressing conditions and passions which find their outlet in expression are in fact assimilated by the occupying power in a cathartic process. To aid such processes is in a certain sense to avoid their dramatisation and to clear the atmosphere. But such a situation can only be transitory. In fact, the progress of national consciousness among the people modifies and gives precision to the literary utterances of the native intellectual. The continued cohesion of the people constitutes for the intellectual an invitation to go farther than his cry of protest. The lament first makes the indictment; then it makes an appeal. In the period that follows, the words of command are heard. The crystallisation of the national consciousness will both disrupt literary styles and themes, and also create a completely new public. While at the beginning the native intellectual used to produce his work to be read exclusively by the oppressor, whether with the intention of charming him or of denouncing him through ethnical or subjectivist means, now the native writer progressively takes on the habit of addressing his own people.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify