Favorite Daughter Peels Off Virgin Label

My college-loving book and culture nut daughter blogs, too. Writes rings around me already, to be honest, and certainly around the unhoned writer and thinker I was at her age!

She gave me permission to crosspost her latest work here. It's true I thought Liza, Lorraine, moiv and CaLiberal (who I keep wanting to call Callie!) would especially like it, but also I want her POV accessible here at Culture Kitchen, because I hope it will speak to a larger progressive audience in the too-often-unheard voice of young feminism, from the direct line of fire in the culture wars.

RUMINATIONS ON OLIVE OIL
Standing in line at a fancy grocery store, I spotted a display among many :
EXTRA EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL! It proclaimed.

Excuse me? I thought. Extra extra? Isn’t that a little unnecessary?

That is to say, I never really understood the concept of Extra Virgin Olive Oil to begin with. Is it made from olives that aren’t allowed to touch other olives? Are they modestly shielded from life’s elements by tarps?

And Extra Extra Virgin Olives - what on earth does that entail?

Or does the “virgin” refer to the oil itself? Has it never been mixed with another oil, commingling and developing new, brassy flavors? I certainly hope not, one takes for granted when one buys olive oil that it is, in fact, olive oil, and not some other hybrid. But then it seems that they shouldn’t have to bellow about its virginity so explicitly.

Having all these thoughts in the line at the store, I suddenly reached a breaking point. I wanted to tap the older woman in front of me on the shoulder and ask her my question, maybe she’d know the answer. But no, that wasn’t enough. I wanted stand up in a shopping cart, I wanted to address the store at large, I wanted to shout it to the heavens: “Isn’t just being a virgin enough for you people anymore?”

It’s not just olive oil - women, too, now, are expected to come with a label that reads Extra Extra Virgin.

Much of society appears to have decided - rather abruptly, if you ask me - that it is not enough to wait for a person, time, and place that connote “right” and “safe” before you have sex for the first time. To make the whole process more efficient and less painful, the decision-making process has been streamlined - good news! You’re no longer required to make those pesky decisions; we’ve done it for you.

Person: Husband/Wife.

Place: Hotel Room.

Time: Honeymoon.

I could say a lot of things about the abstinence program. I could say that repression, sexual or otherwise, isn’t healthy. (See this movie to learn how it leads to broken families, insanity, and arguably the Great Depression.)

I could say that it makes people ashamed of what’s perfectly natural, and thus leads to self-loathing.

But I think I’m going to focus mainly on how creepy it is.

Let me give you some background: I’m kind of a Daddy’s girl. My father is arguably the most awesome guy on the face of the planet. When I was a little kid he took me to the park; taught me how to swim; taught me how to ride a bike and then took me bike riding; took me out to get frozen yogurt; gave me rides on his shoulders; played catch with me (although his less-than-perfect-aim has been well documented: he once accidentally hit me in the stomach with a baseball, knocking the wind out of me; and once accidentally hit my brother in the eye with a tennis ball, resulting in a quick trip to the eye doctor)(both my brother and I are fine, by the way).

He can fix anything, and if he runs into something he can’t fix, he knows somebody who can. In work, he’s always been like our personal family Superman, bringing down bad guys and championing what’s right. And even though he’s always threatened to scare my boyfriends with elaborately frightening scenarios I think he once saw in the movies, now that I actually have a boyfriend hanging around, my dad kind of likes him (they talk about computer stuff).

So, as you can probably tell, I love my dad. And my dad loves me. But I don’t talk to my dad about sex. It’s not that I’m having sex and hiding it from him (or having any at all, actually, hidden or otherwise); or that I’m worried that if I mention it he’ll become a crazy man and scream at me to “protect my flower,” or something. It isn’t anything like that. It’s just……….ewww.

Why would I talk to him about that? When we watch TV and a sexy scene comes on, one of us will almost invariably leave the room due to embarrassment and awkwardness. From what I understand, most father-daughter relationships work this way: As long as I’m okay, he doesn’t want to think about, much less hear about, my having a sex life; and for my part, I don’t want to think about, much less hear about, him having a sex life. As Dave Barry once put it: “Most of us have trouble believing our parents ever had sex, even when they conceived us. Deep down inside, we believe that our mothers got pregnant because of fallout from atomic testing during the Truman administration.”

So, with this dynamic, you can see that I am not the type of person to put on a fluffy pink ball gown, elaborately braid my hair and adorn it with a tiara, take my father to a dance, and promise him, in front of everyone, that I am absolutely, 100%, definitely going to remain a virgin until I marry whatever random guy I wind up marrying.

But apparently some people do this.

In a chandelier-lit ballroom overlooking the Rocky Mountains one recent evening, some hundred couples feast on herb-crusted chicken and julienned vegetables. The men look dapper in tuxedos; their dates are resplendent in floor-length gowns, long white gloves and tiaras framing twirly, ornate updos. Seated at a table with four couples, I watch as the gray-haired man next to me reaches into his breast pocket, pulls out a small satin box and flips it open to check out a gold ring he’s about to place on the finger of the woman sitting to his right. Her eyes well up with tears as she is overcome by emotion. The man’s date? His 25-year-old daughter. Welcome to Colorado Springs’ Seventh Annual Father-Daughter Purity Ball, held at the five-star Broadmoor Hotel. The event’s purpose is, in part, to celebrate dad-daughter bonding, but the main agenda is for fathers to vow to protect the girls’ chastity until they marry and for the daughters to promise to stay pure. Pastor Randy Wilson, host of the event and cofounder of the ball, strides to the front of the room, takes the microphone and asks the men, “Are you ready to war for your daughters’ purity?”

You can read the full article here but I’m going to pretty much rip it all apart for you right now.

If you’re creeped out already, allow me to make you even more so:

Randy Wilson’s 19-year-old, Khrystian, is typical: She works at her church, spends most weekends at home with her family and has never danced with a male other than her father or brother. Emily Smith, an 18-year-old I meet, says that even kissing is out for her. “I made a promise to myself when I was younger,” she says, “to save my first kiss for my wedding day.”

It’s just as I always feared! With even kissing left socially unacceptable, I am – along with, I think, almost all of you – the slut my morally upright peers have always warned me against becoming! Is there no hope? Repent! REPENT! Surely God can un-ring a bell!

Maybe you don’t think this is creepy yet. Okay, you think, this is a little on the bizarre side, but surely it’s just a means of fathers bonding with college-age daughters, a means of the daughters placating them, gently cooing of COURSE I’m a virgin, Daddy……

But, oh, the worst is yet to come.

The majority of the girls here are, as purity ball guidelines suggest, “just old enough…[to] have begun menstruating….” But a couple dozen fathers have also brought girls under 10. “This evening is more about spending time with her than her purity at this point,” says one seven-year-old’s dad, a trifle sheepishly. The event is seemingly innocent—not once do I hear “sex” or “virgin” cross anyone’s lips. Still, every one of the girls here, even the four-year-old, will sign that purity covenant.

Yeah. That’s right. Four. Years. Old. You want to talk about indoctrination?

I actually feel so much better. I thought these girls were going to parties and talking about sex with their dads, which would have been, in my view, gross. But now I realize: they aren’t talking about sex. At all. They’re throwing around the word “purity” without explaining one iota of connotation behind it.

When I ask Hannah Smith, 15, what purity means to her, she answers, “I actually don’t know.” Her older sister Emily jumps in: “Purity, it means…I don’t know how to explain it. It is important to us that we promise to ourselves and to our fathers and to God that we promise to stay pure until…. It is hard to explain.”

Looks to me like these girls don’t know what the authority figures around them expect them to do – or not do – to remain “pure”. I’m eerily reminded of the 1950s, in which the majority of girls knew next to nothing about sex, or even menstruation, because people figured, I don’t know, if they didn’t mention it, the kids wouldn’t find out about it.

Good thing we’re not asking the girls at these purity balls to sign contacts based on this premise they can’t comprehend!

Thousands of girls have taken purity vows at these events over the past nine years. While the abstinence movement itself is fairly mainstream—about 10 percent of teen boys and 16 percent of girls in the United States have signed virginity pledges at churches, rallies or programs sponsored by groups such as True Love Waits—purity balls represent its more extreme edge. The young women who sign covenants at these parties tend to be devout, homeschooled and sheltered from popular culture.

Oh. I see. Well, still, it’s really cute that these fathers are so sentimental about protecting their little girls from the Big Bad Wolves out there in the woods ( Princes wait there in the world, it's true/Princes, yes, but wolves and humans, too/Stay at home/I am home). Right?

The older girls at the Broadmoor tonight are themselves curvaceous and sexy in backless dresses and artful makeup; next to their fathers, some look disconcertingly like wives. In fact, in the parlance of the purity ball folks, one-on-one time with dad is a “date,” and the only sanctioned one a girl can have until she is “courted” by a man. The roles are clear: Dad is the only man in a girl’s life until her husband arrives, a lifestyle straight out of biblical times. “In patriarchy, a father owns a girl’s sexuality,” notes psychologist and feminist author Carol Gilligan, Ph.D. “And like any other property, he guards it, protects it, even loves it.”

Creepy enough for you? Because I have more.

Following dessert—chocolate cake or fruit coulis for the adults, ice cream sundaes for the girls—couples file into the adjacent ballroom. Seven ballerinas, including Christy Parcha, appear in white gowns with tulle skirts, carrying on their shoulders a large, rustic wooden cross that they lift up and rest on a stand. Lisa Wilson cries as she presents each of their three ceremonial dances, one of which is called “I’ll Always Be Your Baby.” Afterward, Randy Wilson and a fellow pastor, Steve Holt, stand at the cross with heavy rapiers raised and announce that they are prepared to “bear swords and war for the hearts of our daughters.” The blades create an inverted “V” under which girls and fathers kneel and lay white roses that symbolize purity. Soon there is a heap of cream-colored buds wilting beneath the outstretched arms of the cross.

Let’s, for a moment, ignore the enormity of the ickyness, shall we? Let’s focus on one detail: the inverted V.

For starters, it is the first letter in the word “vagina”, which I bet they never told you on Sesame Street.

And, because I am a well-established sinner, I have read Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code (aka Leonardo, Dan, and the Formulaic Religious Thriller That Has Been Read By Every Non-Catholic On The Face Of The Earth).

The “chalice” or V, historically, symbolizes womanhood. Guess why. Because it looks like – and literally symbolized for many ancient cultures – a womb.

But what does the chalice becomes when you turn it upside down (or “invert” it), boys and girls? It becomes the “blade” symbol. Which is a traditionally male symbol. And you don’t have to study Freud to deduce why that little triangle represents men.

So. You have your archetypically naive virgins. Each has a father and a white rose, which they are placing beneath a gigantic penis formed by swords. The analysis does itself – subservience to the macho, my daughter!

Here’s the money shot: In the language of the flowers, white roses mean “love that is pure or innocent.” Ah, but these flowers, the reporter notes, are “wilting beneath the arms of the cross.” A dried white rose means “death preferable to loss of innocence.”

Yes. Yes indeed. We are, in fact, moving – pardon my French – ass backward into the 1950s. Back into the era of disinformation. Even farther, if you like. To crusades, to chastity belts.

Although I think my mom has said it recently, this Inherit the Wind quote never gets old:

“Because fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy, and needs feeding. And soon, your Honor, with banners flying and with drums beating we'll be marching backward, BACKWARD, through the glorious ages of that Sixteenth Century when bigots burned the man who dared bring enlightenment and intelligence to the human mind!”

Didn’t the fifties teach us anything? Didn’t we learn that failing to educate teenagers about sex is a very, very bad idea? Didn’t we learn that failing to explain safe sex can ruin multiple lives? Exhibit A: The Girls Who Went Away.

Girls who weren’t given information about sex. Girls who wound up having it anyway, one way or another – and, of course, it was unsafe, because it was nearly impossible to procure contraceptives, even if you were married. When the girls (inevitably) got pregnant, they were sent away to homes and forced to give up their children for adoption. Boom, lifelong scarring for mother, child, and everyone in their orbit.

Nice, abstinence program. Your fault.

But back to the olive oil. I stood standing there, looking at it in its extra-extra-virginity for a long time.

And I found myself bereft. Isn’t just being a virgin enough anymore?

http://culturekitchen.com/jj_ross/blog/favorite_daughter_peels_off_virgin_label
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
JJ Ross's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Michael Bouldin's picture

"I’ll Always Be Your Baby"

Ick Ick Ick Ick.

Just Ick.

Your daughter's very good. My compliments.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

Beaming

-- that's it, just beaming. Smiling :)
JJ

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Michael Bouldin's picture

Well-deserved.

More, please Smiling.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
NanceConfer's picture

Yep, you can

go put away your keyboard now, JJ. Smiling

Well done, FD. Well done!

This is the sort of info I squint at because it IS just too icky for me to look at head on. That these people have no more awareness of themselves than to go through these bizarre rituals with a straight face. . . very odd.

Here was my bit of good news today. I made it back to the Planned Parenthood office to follow up on volunteering. Turns out they don't need volunteers. I'm taking that as good news anyway. That they have enough paid staff.

So now what mischief should I be getting up to? FD's got feminism covered. . . Smiling

Nance

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

She Loved This Nance

and it meant a lot to her that you said so. This is her debut in a way, of what's most important to HER, and thank god not under crossed swords vying to control her. Smiling

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Margaret Bassett's picture

Virginity, or lack thereof, is saved one

young female at a time. I say female, because men have to learn having babies is a sex-linked occupation. If they announce "we are pregnant" they're delusional. It's not to deny fathers an important part in their children's lives. It's just to be real about biology.
I read a headline which related that universities are going to provide cheaper sex education. What's that? Price of the pill reduced? Glad to have a college student to enlighten me.
I have written before that young women, and particularly young women from strict religious backgrounds, need mentors. Perhaps a well instructed teacher, a coach, a curious neighbor. Where families live by a code that makes it impossible to even mention sex, it is not likely that a girl has a chance to ask questions. If she tries, she'll be sidetracked into a curiosity turned to guilt for even thinking "that way." By the time the 50's came, most of us grown women were seething radicals. We had lived through the "repression" excuses and the undying love routine but still had no way of getting real information. History of Margaret Sanger and the Comstock Law, yes. Physiology and sexuality, no.
When my little neighbor girl, a sophomore in high school, told me that her girlfriend threw down a condom in front of her plate in the cafeteria and told her to use it, I laughed and wanted to know what she did with it. She said she was very embarrassed. I said I would have handed it back to her girlfriend and told her I didn't have a place to put it. She was more practical. She handed it to a sophomore boy at the table and he said he would give it to his older brother who could use it. (It came through a webpage where they gave samples.) There are no children who can't find out what sex is if they can get to a computer. They learn proper anatomical names. But who is to teach sexuality? JenLo? MTV? Eventually, my friend came to me and said she wanted to talk to me about sex. We talked. She thanked me and said she knew I would tell her and "they" wouldn't. This was hard for me because her mother is in a nursing home and had asked me to help with her Christian upbringing. I had from the start told the woman I was not a fundamentalist but I would do the best I could. I tell this long story, because there is a legal/ethical component to being a mentor. Never would I try to pre-empt the parents' rights to raise their daughter. It takes close contact with a child before puberty to make this work. I ask a question. Do pediatricians have doctor assistants? Are there really any school counselors who have good training?
Living here in East Tennessee, I feel there will be many generations before the Enlightenment strikes. But AFDC has a vested interest. With few abortions and adoptions, it's breaking the state coffers. A couple of years ago the legislature increased the cost of a marriage license, reducing it considerably if the couple brings in a certificate that they had marriage counseling, which usually turns out to be by the minister who will marry them. The unwed mother part is still not addressed.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

Relationships

and connections are what make or break ideas for me, and both sex and pregnancy are so overwhelmingly, obviously to me about infinitely complex relationships, that I marvel at how they ever can be treated anywhere as "pure" or "sinful" or "biology" much less "matters of law."

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Margaret Bassett's picture

Read the NYTimes Book section

I saved the review and also first chapter of a book called "Sweet Chastity" which details virginity. I'm sure you will want to peruse it. And I need to actually read both before I can join the thread again.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
JJ Ross's picture

Oh my!

Racy stuff indeed, even where it's cultural and not necessarily political -- Favorite Daughter is poring (or pouring, as in olive oil?) over it right now.

Virginia, the first English settlement in North America, was named for Queen Elizabeth I’s most celebrated attribute (which makes me wonder whether the state’s tourism officials want to reconsider whether Virginia really is for lovers).

. . . Blank gives the history of the so-called “virgin cure,” the belief that men could be cured of sexually transmitted diseases by having sex with a virgin. . . In 18th-century London, one in every five capital rape cases involved children under the age of 10, and the rapists commonly cited the virgin-cure myth in their defense. . . . it persists in southern Africa and is a major contributor to the escalating AIDS crisis.

The thrust of Blank’s book seems to be that for many eons, in patriarchal societies, women needed to prove they were virgins so that their deflowerers could be assured of paternity and thus take care of the offspring — and that, gee, that was kind of miserable and sexist. Under the Roman Empire, fathers had the right to kill their daughters if they had sex before marriage (or outside of it later), and the right to kill the offending male as well.

. . .In an era marked by a “chaotic maelstrom of virginities,” Blank’s book is a useful, if sometimes clumsy, antidote to our confusion.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Margaret Bassett's picture

Just who's copping the maidenhead?

Expression comes from my husband's way of showing beenthere/donethat in all sorts of events. I never thought to ask him whether he knew where the expression came from. Usually he was saying it after he perceived someone thought he was naive.
When I read about killing unfaithful daughters and wives, I thought of Afghanistan. One of the reasons this country went into Afghanistan was to set women free. (Seemed, to me,like a neoconservative argument for female votes.) I don't know whether some women really thought this was a plus for feminism, but I doubt it, considering how American woman (among others)are used to lures when it comes to talk of sex.
There is no doubt the Rovian regime is sensitive to male superiority. If they can dictate where condoms are forbidden in foreign aid, why would they not want to be sensitive to the unconceived children of the world? "W is for Women" in 04 worked when Laura (first a lady and secondly a First Lady on the campaign trail) played the helpmate to a T. In one of the debates, she had a heavy schedule before that evening. Of course, her transportation was of the best, but still it's hard to make quick changes when one is supposed to look her best.
'Sposed to. I hear the phrase often. Shoes and purses should match. Wear solid colors if you're heavy. Have a child every two years (this from older women who breastfed and had automatic contraception). So I don't need to go on. Everyone knows not to rant and rave. But just one more teeny little observation. As a guest of a fairly middle of the road Baptist Church I ran into the question of original sin. I braced myself and expected everything but the restatement of how we've been stuck with the "curse" ever since. But no. This preacher, whose wife is educated as a public school teacher, saw the light. He told us that the bite of the apple was also wrong for Adam although Eve did it. Because, he should have observed her needs and explained to her that God wouldn't like it.
And then we went out for ice cream.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Data from the 2002 survey indicate that by age 20, 77% of respondents had had sex, 75% had had premarital sex, and 12% had married; by age 44, 95% of respondents (94% of women, 96% of men, and 97% of those who had ever had sex) had had premarital sex. Even among those who abstained until at least age 20, 81% had had premarital sex by age 44. Among cohorts of women turning 15 between 1964 and 1993, at least 91% had had premarital sex by age 30. Among those turning 15 between 1954 and 1963, 82% had had premarital sex by age 30, and 88% had done so by age 44.

Conclusions. Almost all Americans have sex before marrying. These findings argue for education and interventions that provide the skills and information people need to protect themselves from unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases once they become sexually active, regardless of marital status.

— Lawrence B. Finer

Poll