Allow me to ponder upon Sarah Palin's appearance on SNL

I already ranted about Sarah Palin's appearance on SNL.

Let me throw some ponderous thoughts into the mix.

There's quite a lengthy article today at The New Yorker which explains how Palin got into the halls of Capitol Hill by way of their back doors. In "The Insiders : How John McCain came to pick Sarah Palin", we have a shrewd and ambitious woman using every little stepping stone she can to get herself out of her "small town state" and into the big scene of Washington DC.

A feat that would have been all but impossible without the power the internet has in generating buzz.

It is interesting to see Sarah Palin the opportunist harnessing what some would flippantly call, "the power of the blogs". The story seems to suggest that the stars all aligned in Palin's favor. Meaning, once a so-called random blogger named Adam Brickley started a movement to draft her as Vice-President, blogging stars like Instapundit and Michelle Malkin noticed which in turn brought the attention of people like Rush Limbaugh, Bill Krystol and others.

All by the grace of god, as Adam Brickley would suggest.

Right. Because there could be no possibility of, you know, a little bit of astroturfing on the part of the PR agency Sarah Palin had hired to raise her visibility among the East Coast elite media.

In the end though it doesn't matter whether Palin was an active creator of the internet buzz that brought her into McCain's VP position. What's relevant is her flair for not just marketing herself as a "new improved" brand of the GOP. You have to give it to Sarah Palin : She has a knack for creating and aura of celebrity buzz around her.

She knew she needed image consultants and a PR machine. She wasn't beneath capturing an opportunity presented by an blogging nobody and Heritage Foundation alum like Brickley in order to fulfill her ambition.

Most importantly, she knew exactly how to act as the chosen one for the Republican party.

John Bitney, a top policy adviser on Palin’s 2006 gubernatorial campaign, said, “Sarah’s very conscientious about crafting the story of Sarah. She’s all about the hockey mom and Mrs. Palin Goes to Washington—the anti-politician politician.”

She knows how to walk, talk and be the exotic conservative bird the republican Washington elite have been dreaming for since the days of Reagan. Yet she lacks, unfortunately, his intellect; making her a good mime instead of a character actor.

Actually, John Cleese, in talking about Sarah Palin, described her as a well-trained parrot. She is not so much acting as she is mimicking the character she has been told to be; following a script but without understanding what she is saying.

It's this idea of Sarah Palin as a parrot that actually made me feel disappointed when I saw her on SNL. Palin spoke bits and pieces, but her voice was completely coopted and taken away from her, especially in the Amy Pohler piece.

I can understand her choosing not to rap, but it's beyond me that the McCain campaign acquiesced to her not just not doing much during her appearance. She had to endure being ridiculed by Pohler while being glacially ignored by Fey's Palin.

It's amazng to me that there was no possibility for her to, for example, read a "right wing version" of the news. As in, to come in an "correct" the liberal media bias from the anchors.

It may well be all of SNL's fault. It may be the writer's and performers contempt clouded their imagination.

Yet I get the sinking feeling it was a lack of courage from Palin and the McCain campaign that had her there, barbie'ing her appearance. It may well be that, in the urge to completely control her "blank slateness" and her parrotting ways, they didn't want her to veer off their script. And since she has no improv skills, they couldn't take the chance of approving a skit that could have been changed at the last minute by any of the actors or the producers of the show.

That's what's so mind boggling.

Just as I thought she'd shatter my opinion of her, she goes on to prove exactly what I think of her. That the woman is a very willing and ambitious parrot. That she "empty vessels" herself to become the reflection of other people's desires so long as it gets her to where she wants to go. This is, am afraid to say, taking politics to the darkest depths of beauty pageantry.

She will be your hockey mom if you give her fame.

She will be your pit bull with lipstick if you give her riches.

She will be your well-trained parrot if she gets to be called Madame President.

Or in this case, Madame Puppet.

The SNL skit seemed to confirm the cynicism that propelled Palin to such a high profile position. No wonder she couldn't look at Fey's parody in the eye.  It would have been like looking into her own soul.


http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/allow_me_to_ponder_upon_sarah_palins_appearance_on
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
About author n/a
liza's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Megan Smith's picture

Sarah Palin on SNL

I don't see why the McCain campaign had Palin do SNL in the first place. If the point was to show she can be funny, it was a lame endeavor. If the point was to show she can laugh at herself, it didn't work because she was so tightly scripted, there was nothing to play off of.

I think the McCain campaign kept a very tight leash on what she was and was not allowed to be involved with on SNL and it made the whole endeavor pointless. But Amy Poehler was hysterical.

Megan


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Famously opposed educators come together:

"Our macro-level differences do not interfere with our mutual respect for each other’s work.
That itself is something we hope our schools can help teach young people.

Our differences helped us consider ways to rethink our ideas and find places where those holding different views might compromise, and perhaps learn to live under one umbrella.

What we hope to model is the idea of democratic engagement, the notion that citizens need to think about and debate their beliefs and values with others who do not necessarily share all of them.

We want the issues connected to schooling to be a matter for discussion among all people who care.

We don’t have it in our power to solve the problems that confront American education—not those that take place within the schoolhouse, much less those that have a direct impact on children’s ability to learn, such as their unequal access to health care, housing, and myriad other life necessities.

But we hope that we have it in our power to provoke the thinking that must precede, accompany, and follow any attempt to reform—perhaps, even better, to transform—our schools."


Deborah Meier and Diane Ravitch May 24, 2006 commentary in EDUCATION WEEK


Poll