First anniversary of the "Be Red Be Bold" campaign to stop violence against women of color

I was a teacher for almost 10 years here in NYC. When I started, I was very young (21 years old) yet had had years of experience teaching children, teenagers and adult alike as a Spanish language instructor.

I decided to work as a teacher a few years after graduating from college, so when I started as a Public High School teacher here in NYC, I couldn't teach Spanish, for it wasn't my major in college. I was thrown into the History department of Eastern District High School to teach a mostly immigrant population of teenagers History and Social Studies in (mostly) Spanish and (some) English.

It was a horrible and yet formative experience in my life.

Years before teaching, when I was still a Catholic, I had studied the teachings of  Gustavo Freire's in "Pedagogia do Oprimido" and Leonardo Boff in "Teologia da Liberação". What struck me, as a  middle class intelectual wannabe of "grey collar" parents, was the focus on the violence of poverty.

Hunger, homelessness, unemployment, discrimination, illiteracy : We don't even have to talk about actual physical violence acts in order to think of all the different violent ways in which poverty and marginalization hit many communities of color.

Yet what reverberated with me was how the scars of slavery, servitude, apartheid, segregation and marginalization are carried into future generations. How in a family that had to endure years of the violence of poverty you could have newer, freer and more affluent generations still carrying that legacy through patterns of behaviour : addiction, abuse, low-self esteem.

I saw way too much of these kinds of behaviours around me teaching in a 90% children of color population where 30% were immigrants (a big chunk of them being Central American refugees of the Iran-Contra War) and where 95% of the kids needed government assistance for basics like school lunch, health care, housing.

Within Latinos and African Americans I can attest to the fact that flogging our kids if they misbehave is still a common practice. Too many kids are taught from an early age that their bodies are not theirs but "leased to them" by their parents until they reach either the age of consent or 21 years of age. Isn't it any wonder why so teenage Latina and Black girls may end up trapped with abusive boyfriends who think nothing of smacking them around? I even had one girl who ended up giving birth to a child at the age of 15 after being date-raped by a 20-something loser from the hood.

As a Public High School teacher and later on an Adjunct Professor in colleges and community colleges I could see the tell-tale signs of girls (and even some boys) who were abused. It wasn't just the Latinas. I had too many Asian girls at NYU who you just could tell lived in terror of doing anything wrong at the school because of the devastating consequences back at home.

So here's to creating a world free from racialized and gendered violence by being bold and working to end it.


http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/first_anniversary_of_the_be_red_be_bold_campaign_t
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
About author n/a
liza's picture



Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

So the recent struggles about network neutrality have led me to recognize something I hadn't quite seen before. And that something in turn makes more puzzling the debates that have been raised around network neutrality. The something to recognize is that in a fundamental sense, fair use (FU) and network neutrality (NN) are the same thing. They are both state enforced limits on the property rights of others. In both cases, the limits are slight --the vast range of uses granted a copyright holder are only slightly restricted by FU; the vast range of uses allowed a network owner are only slightly restricted by NN. And in both cases, the line defining the limits is uncertain. But in both cases, those who support each say that the limits imposed on the property right are necessary for some important social end (admittedly, different in each case), and that the costs of enforcing those limits are outweighed by the benefits of protecting that social end. So from this perspective, it is easy to understand those who reject FU and NN (who are they?). And it is easy to understand those who embrace FU and NN. What gets difficult is understanding those who embrace one while rejecting the other --at least when that rejection is articulated in terms of "government regulation".

Poll