Hillary Clinton bows out and endorses Barack Obama

I came in just in time to watch Hillary Clinton give her endorsement to Barack Obama. It was an interesting speech. She never talked about losing, she talked about the disappointment of not getting the nomination. She also didn't talk about Obama's legitimate win, she only mentioned his victory.

I was on Twitter writing about the speech and I have to say I am relieved she finally said the words a lot of us wanted to hear 2 months ago : that is time to come together and support Obama.

I thought it was gracious and I also noticed that she kept on repeating at the end "we need to help elect barack obama our president" , almost as if she repeated it seven times herself she would truly and honestly embrace it.

I was also taken aback by her late realization that she became a woman who ran for president as opposed to being a candidate who happened to be a woman. I've always said that Hillary Clinton never struck me as a feminist, but as one of the millions of middle class white women who benefitted from the equal opportunity policies that came after the Civil Rights and Women's Rights movements.

Yet this campaign seems to have made her a born-again feminist :

"I am a woman, and like millions of women, I know there are still barriers and biases out there, often unconscious, and I want to build an America that respects every one of us," she said. "We must make sure that women and men alike understand the struggles of their grandmothers and mothers."

It was really refreshing to hear her say that this country needed to work for women's equality. It's amazing, because as the Senator of New York I had never, ever heard her utter those words.

So am going to say "Thanks Hillary" and leave it at that, for now because the hard part just begun --after a brutal campaign that she waged by attacking Obama as the least prepared of the two, there's just no amount of campaigning she can do that'll take those words back.


liza's picture

| | | | | | |


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Kevin Hayden's picture

I considered her a feminist

I thought she was a very important and outspoken advocate for women globally, but as First Lady, not so much as Senator.

Her advocacy for children prior to marriage receives the most press, but she was an articulate feminist then, too. I don't know how nuanced she was in covering the range of subset issues that encompasses, but as she took up elective office, she's been a bit too embracing of the patriarchal constructs, not just in Senate structure but in her participation in that odd conservative fundie prayer group there, too.

Is that the necessary price of higher ambition?

Personally, I think there's a higher more authentic glass ceiling that can be broken that involves pursuit of change without surrendering key principles. But wtf do I know?


liza's picture

Hey Kev

She's from the school of feminism that believes you have to be more like a man to be successful.

I think that's not only key to her problems --if you embrace the patriarchy because you believe that's the path to success, then you are still part of the status quo that creates obstacles for women in the first place.

I think that's part of the reason so many women, especially young women, were turned off. You don't have to be a feminist academic to get how incongruous that path to empowerment is.

As to this,

Personally, I think there's a higher more authentic glass ceiling that can be broken that involves pursuit of change without surrendering key principles. But wtf do I know?

LOL! Well you obviously have given us the answer there, no?


Morgaine Swann's picture

I'm with you, Liza

I never considered her a feminist. She's more of an entitled rich white lady. If you've got enough money, isms barely touch you.


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1254 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

"Way down deep the American people are afraid of an entangling relationship between formal religions -- or whole bodies of religious belief -- and government. Apart from constitutional law and religious doctrine, there is a sense that tells us it's wrong to presume to speak for God or to claim God's sanction of our particular legislation and his rejection of all other positions. Most of us are offended when we see religion being trivialized by its appearance in political throw-away pamphlets."


— -- Mario Cuomo, address, University of Notre Dame, September 13, 1984, quoted from Albert J. Menendez and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify