John McCain's campaign was never suspended and he never bailed out of tonight's debate

John McCain is getting his ass to Grand Ole after all. Tonight's debate is on as scheduled. After all, this little stunt of his was a huge mistake.

Obama better wipe the floor with this ass rag.

Bookmark/Search this post with:

» liza's blog | add new comment | email this blog | printer friendly version | 483 reads

Please...

Submitted by Truthilicious (not verified) on 26 September 2008 - 12:00pm.

...you are a sheep who has blindly followed the liberal media in demonizing McCain for putting his JOB before politics. Shameful... truly shameful.

» reply | email this comment | 0 points

Which job is that?

Submitted by MLD1979 (not verified) on 27 September 2008 - 5:09am.

Bailing out companies (which shouldn't happen in a free market economy)?

» reply | email this comment | 0 points

Totally!

Submitted by liza on 27 September 2008 - 5:02pm.

I find myself leaning more towards the libertarian and conservative "market forces" POV than the neo-con philosophy of a lot of the Republicans and Democrats that are screaming "bail out".

'Cause make no mistake, Clinton Democrats are just neo-cons with a liberal social agenda.

What am getting out of all this bail out mania is more like the government is helping a few companies to prey and gobble up the competition. JP Morgan taking over WaMu? Talk about naked opportunism.

» reply | email this comment | 0 points

Buy it!

Visit our sponsors

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers
Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Words to live by

How do we know? I mean, what you're saying is fine. But how do we know that that's actually the law? I mean there are a lot of people who absolutely in very good faith would say that isn't competing harm. They would say that the competing right for the life of the fetus is more important than the possibility of the mother having children in the future herself. See, there are people in good faith on both sides of this argument. And so how do we know that ... your competing harms defense is going to do for this particular woman what a health exception would do?

— Justice Stephen Breyer