Online tools for predicting Super-Tuesday winners

Joshua Levy had to say this last time around about search patterns and elections :

Amidst all of the head-scratching — or self-flagellating, as I like to call it — following pollsters’ erroneous predictions in New Hampshire is a sign that the web may have had it right all along.

Yahoo! has released some Buzz data that shows that Hillary Clinton’s “Buzz Score” — “the percentage of Yahoo! users searching for that subject on a given day, multiplied by a constant to make the number easier to read” — went up and up in the runup to the New Hampshire primary. At the same time, Barack Obama’s score spiked downward.

In addition, the fine folks at Yahoo! report that on the day of the New Hampshire primary Clinton’s Buzz Score among New Hampshire women spiked on primary day. (It’s scary that they know this information so precisely).

Obama originally led in searches among voters age 45 and older, but by primary day Clinton had a 15% lead over Obama.

If Yahoo's Election08 Political Dashboard is any indication, as of 8:28am EST, the winners will be :

  • Barack Obama : His buzz track has gone up 14.2% for a 67% of all political searches.
  • John McCain : By a razor thin margin given his searches have declined almost 20% while Romney's are up almost 8%.

Another predictor is online betting. Over at William Hill's elections blog they're saying :

Bookmaker William Hill makes it odds-on that Clinton will win more or less half the states up for grabs (Hillary Clinton to win 8-15 states is a 4/7 shot). And virtually the same bet is available for Barack Obama (2/1) (4/7 to win between 7 and 12 states).

This means that anyone who fancies either candidate to strongly outperform the other across the country is guaranteed a good price. Obama to win 13-18 states is currently a generous-looking 7/2.


Eventhough betting sites like BoDog.com are giving Hillary
Clinton the edge, online betting actually failed last year during the midterm elections : The odds last year said the Republicans would keep their majority in the Senate while the House would go to Democrats.

Which leaves me to agree that come August, we will be seeing a brokered convention.


liza's picture

| | | | | | |


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1266 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

I've essentially been driven out of activism, and being gainfully employed is much more attractive than being marginalized. Note this doesn't mean there are no benefits - it means it's not worth the costs. The fact that the skeptical side considers a weighing of positives and negatives, while the marketing side seems to follow a cultist reinforcement of only favorable evidence, inclines me to believe that the skeptical side is right and the marketing side is wrong.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify