Upsetting thought of the day

So let me get this straight : The US had 750 billion dollars to bail out Wall Street; a sector of the US economy which has been historically controlled by "white" or US Americans of European ascendancy. The US Congress found 750 billion dollars for them and their European and Asian investors. A bailout, by the way, that now said banks are pooh-poohing, lest the US Treasury and tax-payers find out the depths of their accounting infamies. Yet there's no money to pay back reparations to African Americans for the evils of slavery and Jim Crow laws?

Discuss.

[A scene from the movie Birth of a Nation (1915). Image found in Wikipedia under "Lynching in America")


http://culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/upsetting_thought_of_the_day
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
About author n/a
liza's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Julette Millien's picture

reparations

Amazing, the priorities. What has been particularly distressing about this bailout is the racially tinged accusations of how low-income people and their greed for a home, caused the blowout.
A blowout that has been in the makings for MANY decades. And had more to do with hedge funds, derivatives, NO investments in manufacturing and infrastructure AND major GREED among our financial and political leaders - across party lines.

This is troubling - this issue of reparations and priorities. We are expected to have moved on, forgiven all, yet there continues to be evidence of systemic racism. Even a formal statement of apology is yet to be made...some have dabbled...

And of course we do have to move on, we do have to forgive, if we have any hope of maintaining our potency and moral leadership. We have to fight the fight with a clear head and open heart. If we hope to have lasting impact.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Something The Dog Said's picture

I'm conflicted on Reparations

On the one hand there is no doubt that there has been systematic and continuing discrimination since emancipation, and the conditions of slavery were beyond horrific, any sense of justice demands that something be done.

On the other, what would be enough? Is there anyway to make up for what the slaves our country held went through?

More troubling is how you would give some reparation without stoking the thinly vailed racism that still exists? Let's face it, there are a ton of morons out there that have zero empathy for what the slaves went through and what African Americans (and other Americans of color) go through today. To them it would be some kind of unfair bonus that seems unearned.

These are exactly the kind of asshats that would use it as a further justification of their bigotry.

I just don't know, what the best course forward is, but that does not excuse us from trying to find one.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
EYES OF TEXAS's picture

LUCK OF THE IRISH

My ancestors were Irish and got crapped on pretty bad also. Where do I sign up for reparations for their inhumane treatment? Oh, that's right, I just remembered, they were the wrong color to be considered for any type of reparations. All I can say is get over it because it's not going to happen.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Something The Dog Said's picture

Wow, that is totally without

Wow, that is totally without any empathy. But since I am Irish too, do you really think that our history is in any way the same as those that were taken, by force, from their homes, sold as property, worked to death, had their children treated as live stock and were beaten or killed when they tried to escape or resist?

Our ancestors choose to come here. As bad as things were under the English (and let's not minimize that) it was orders of magnitude less than the slaves.

So, you might be a little less of a glib asshole about all of this, eh?


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Wow

I didn't know the Irish were brought over here against their will in chains and bought and sold like property?

I have mixed feelings about reparations, but to compare your immigration by choice story to slavery is pretty much nonsense. But I have noticed that little of what you write has much thought behind it.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Anonymous Hussein's picture

What makes slavery of

What makes slavery of blacks so much more immediately horrible---not sorry, I agree with Morgan Freeman on the term African American; blacks are just as American as anyone else---is that it occurred in a country that built itself up as the land of the free. Jim Crowe is a more recent far -reaching legacy of it.

But I get tired of hearing how all whites have it made. Tell that to the coal miners and the hill dwellers living off pot and moon shine money, who never owned slaves. Those people deserve help, too. I rarely hear or read of black activists advocating help for them or for people who are not black. That makes them just as bad as the white fuckers that try to keep them down. I also hear little about the great accomplishments of early black scholars and inventors from modern black rights activists or from many white activists. It is like they are overlooked in a poor me /poor them way.

Instead of reparations, we should make sure that each public school gains access to the same EXCEPTIONAL books, programs, and food. The money could be used to buy clothes for students and to fund field trips, arts, and sports for children in public schools across the country. Give them annual check-ups, too.

On an interesting side note, read up on the slave trade that existed in Portland until the 1940's. You can tour the tunnels where men and women of all colors were kept drugged until they were shipped off to work in foreign lands. It will horrify you and it will also make you realize that in many corners of the world, this still happens.

But I think the author of this piece makes a valid point. I would rather my money go to reparations than this bailout, even though I do not agree with reparations based on color.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Two prominent Democrats lament the degradation of civil
discourse in graduation addresses:

Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa of Los Angeles,
told University of Southern California graduates it was "poisoning our
politics."

Mark Warner, former Virginia governor speaking at Wake
Forest University, criticized the "personal and partisan attacks" and
"complex issues reduced to easy-to-digest sound bites."

"No one — no one — in politics has a monopoly on virtue,
on patriotism,
or most importantly, on the truth," Mr. Warner said.
"And that goes for
everyone, from conservative to liberal."


— NYT column by David Brooks June 11, 2006 - see Slate's attack on Brooks himself here.


Poll