With 81% of precincts in, Lamont is squeaking by
51.8% (119,100)
Joseph I. Lieberman
48.2% (110,686)
More than 71% of the precints are in and Lamont is squeaking a win by less than 4% --not good to be within the margin of error.
[via courant.com | Lamont Leads Senate Race In Early Returns]:
Ten minutes before the polls closed Tuesday, primary Lamont's supporters were predicting a "landslide" victory."You know how you feel something in your gut?" said Laura Gallo, the former deputy mayor of Meriden as she wrapped up phone calls at Lamont headquarters Tuesday night. "We're going to win."
Others, like former state Democratic party chairman George Jepsen, were relying on something slightly more reliable than gut instinct - he had word from people in the field that returns were coming in overwhelmingly for Lamont.
As the party began at the Sheraton, the Rev. Jesse Jackson made his rounds in the press room talking up Lamont's commitment to urban schools, universal health care and other progressive issues.
"I hope he can win. The nation needs a new direction, new priorities and the values that Lamont represents," Jackson said. "He's taking on a bigger Goliath than just Lieberman."
I don't think Lamont is going to win by a landslide. I thought that a 6% margin was conservative. The difference may be smaller and albeit Dan Gerstein's claim they will not challenge the count, I honestly doubt the Lieberman campaign will walk away quietly. All reports I am reading seem to suggest there is intense focus on absentee ballots.
2006 Elections | Democrats | Joe Lieberman | Ned Lamont




























