Conservatives claim victory. Seriously.

I suppose this was to be expected; being unused to defeat and enmeshed in their discredited ideology to the detriment of common sense, conservatives are claiming that the thrashing received by their party and their candidates on Tuesday was actually, somehow, a victory. Karol over at Alarming News opines:

We have work to do but we're already ahead of the curve because we've seen the American people embrace conservative principles. Democrats had to run to the right to win. That's a success for conservatism, even if its a loss for Republicans.

The snarky response would be that America needs more conservative successes like the one we just saw – many more. But even in terms of actual results, this narrative doesn't withstand scrutiny. I recall that after the fall of the Berlin Wall, seventeen years ago today, some communists in the Soviet bloc rejoiced, claiming this was a welcome development that would allow real communism to flourish; it stands to reason that the ideological cousin of communism, authoritarian conservatism, would make similar claims.

However, this election was a victory for a new coalition of centrists and Progressives. Consider, via Media Matters and DailyKos:

Democrats gained at least 27 seats in the House, six in the Senate, and six governorships, along with a majority of state legislatures. These freshmen got elected on decidedly un-conservative proposals, supported by a majority of Americans in poll after poll and now at the ballot box, such as raising the minimum wage (six states passed referenda doing just that), broadening stem cell research, implementing the 9/11 commission recommendations, and allowing the importation of affordable prescription drugs. The only conservative gains I can see are the six new anti-marriage equality referenda that passed; however, they passed over strengthened opposition, and one such ban, in Arizona, was defeated.

It's also notable that these newly conservative Democrats were called 'Pelosi liberals' during the campaign. Which is it, then?

Nor is it evidence of conservative strength that South Dakota rejected its abortion ban. Get real here, people.

However, a word of caution to the left is in order. We won this election because independents and moderates came over to us in droves. There's a certain temptation, especially at the Progressive base, to claim vindication and to govern only from the left. That would be, in my mind, a mistake of Gingrichian proportions; we have an opportunity to consolidate the political center on our side, and to draw clear contrasts with the barking empty suits of the so-called 'conservative movement'. The country is ready for a Congress that doesn't waste its time, and ours, on flag-burning amendments and Terri Schiavo.

The biggest mistake of the 'conservative movement' was its belief that America could be governed by ideologues; if you're looking for a root cause of the catastrophe of the Bush administration and the fall of the Congress, that would be it. However, our national virtue has always been that we are pragmatic and expressly non-ideological. The Democrats' embrace of this trait, fueled in part by former republicans coming over to us – like myself, I might add – was the key to our victory. The true defeat for conservatism isn't in the victory of Progressives; it's in the fact that our victory came about with an ideological diversity that monolithic movement conservatism can't match, and has cause to fear. Sure, some newly-elected Democrats are socially conservative, and many are fiscally conservative; but they're not ideologues, and that's key. Populist, yes, no doubt.

The future belongs to the pragmatic, open-minded, populist Progressivism that fueled, among others, the candidacies of Jon Tester, Jim Webb, Joe Sestak and Kristen Gillibrand. The country has rejected conservatives; but more than that, it has rejected conservative ideologues, with the emphasis on 'ideologues'.

We're now faced with the opportunity to build a new and lasting coalition, to transform the national dialogue, and do some real work for the American people. 'Conservatism' has discredited itself, and now, it's time to build something that works for all of us.

Even for conservatives.


Michael Bouldin's picture

| |

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1238 guests online.

Online users

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

...We've gone from first to twelfth in world wages. We've had four years where we have produced no private sector jobs. Most people are working harder for less money than they were making ten years ago.

It is because we are in the grip of a failed economic theory. And this decision you are about to make better be about what kind of economic theory you want, not just people saying I'm going to go fix it but what are we going to do? I think what we have to do is invest in American jobs, American education, control American health care costs, and bring the American people together again.


— Democratic Candidate (later President) Bill Clinton


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify