"These broads are millionaires"

I know she shouldn't be given any publicity whatsoever, but Ann Coulter's most recent oeuvre - "Godless: the church of liberalism" - is just too good an example of how the right hates everything that is decent and good in this country to simply pass on by.
In particular, I'd direct your attention to a this excerpt of her book, from an exchange she had with Matt Lauer this morning, as quoted on her Amazon page.
LAUER: On the 9-11 widows, and in particular a group that had been critical of the administration:
" These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing bush was part of the closure process."
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazis. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's death so much."
Coulter is, in all fairness and objectivity, a hateful shrew. She thrives on publicity, even if that involves mocking widows. Perhaps especially if it involves mocking widows.
That's why I strongly suggest to interested New Yorkers that they go to her Amazon page and write a few notes on her book; Amazon has a nifty feature that allows you to write such reviews. The page is here.
American Taliban | Books | Extreme Right | Media | On being blonde | September 11, 2001 | WTF
Feh.
It's "hypocrite".
As to labeling all rightos haters: hey, if the show fits, wear it.
Mike sounds like a hypocrite
Mike sounds like a hypocrite as well, she criticizes people, who she feels to and Mike bashes her and calls her names for doing just that. Hmmm. Sounds like Mike has the case of some self righteouness.
Oh boohoohoo
And you sound like a wackjob, pal. If it's self-righteous to call out this skank for saying the 9/11 widows are enjoying their husbands' deaths, well yeah, guess I'm self-righteous. And you might want to consider uttering a word of criticism about her, because right now, I assume you and your silent ilk think the same things as Coulter does.
Ann Coulter: Nothing but hatred and terroism advocacy
Ann Coulter contributes nothing of substance to political dialogue. All she does is spew hatred and advocate violence. She has advocated violence against political dissenters (attacking liberals with baseball bats) and assassination of a supreme court justice. These things are NOT meaningful contributions to political debate.
Now she attacks those who lost a loved one in the 9/11 attacks because they criticize Bush. I think the 9/11 widows, and I happen to know one, have EVERY reason to criticize Bush. His incompetence allowed 9/11 to happen despite warnings from the FBI, CIA and the Clinton Administration. Furthermore, he has failed to stop those who attacked us. Today al-Qaeda is stronger than ever and has expanded to more nations than ever.
Bush has failed America repeatedly and the 9/11 widows are among those who have paid the price for Bush's failures.
Ann Coulter seems to side with terrorists more than she sides with Americans.
Honestly Don't Know Yet
how I feel about ALL of this. Analytically, I understand operative tactics and countertactics, and yeah, election year showdown, blah blah. Is that all this is? Okay. Michael Moore and Ann Coulter and James Carville and Rush Limbaugh can throw food all day at each other and who the target du jour is, and I feel no need to wade in between them.
But it does seem to me that the venom count in all the rhetoric continues to rachet up way past anything we can justify or come back from to civility, together anyway.































Mike, Let me get this
Mike, Let me get this straight you name call all those on the right along with stereotyping all of them as haters and you write articles condemning Ann for doing the same thing how about you look up the word hypocrit