Barack Obama in Davenport, Iowa

My father was born in Davenport, Iowa. His family (the Kunkels) have lived there since around the Civil War and used to have a sporting good store there. So I always pay attention to the local politics in Davenport.

Well, Obama just swung through Davenport and this video shows what a man of the people he really is:


Bush and McCain won't talk to anyone who hasn't been pre-screened to avoid embarrassing questions. Obama is willing to face the people, including potential critics. The Republicans are afraid of the American people. Obama is one of us.


mole333's picture

| | | | |


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
MK Ultra's picture

Used to eat at ross

Used to go to Ross's when I had serious stoned munchies in the middle of the night.

In 73 I bought a sleeping bag, tent and backpack from Kunkels, paid a lot for it, but I used this equipment for over 30 years! Dead show campouts, Rainbow family gatherings, always with the same gear I bought at Kunkels in 73. The tent was the last to go, fell apart at Schwag Stock in MO in 05!


mole333's picture

Heh

Glad my family sold you quality camping gear. I haven't yet found a chance to visit Davenport but want to someday. My father left Davenport, married my mother in California (where my brother was born) and I was born in Arkansas. My parents divorced when I was young and I lost track of my father until he wrote me from an army base in Pusan, Korea, where he was teaching. I later learned he died and it was after that that I started looking into my ancestry.


EYES OF TEXAS's picture

BASSAKWARDS

You seem to have gotten the names reversed as to who will speak to who in an open discussion. McCain is head over heels above Barak when it comes to talking directly to the people and giving honest answers to whatever is asked. If Obama H. does not have his script from his handlers or a teleprompter to read from he sounds like a tongue tied second grader. When he is confronted with a legit question he can hardly put together a complete sentence in his own words. The man is a media created fraud being supported by the likes of his good real estate buddy from Chicago and factions from the Middle East. He may be one of you and your ilk, but he is diffently not like one of the majority that will control this election.

Obama answers all questions in general terms with no detail as to what was asked. The best he can do is offer hope and change and to this day nobody knows what the hell that means. Hope is to sit around and think something different will happen and change is a double bladed sword, good or bad.


mole333's picture

Ha ha ha ha

You are funny, aren't you? McCain, like his recent mentor, Bush, pre-screens anyone who comes near him. When asked a direct question about his stand on family planning, the man blushed like a child in embarrassment. McCain refers to the nation of Czechoslovakia long after that nation ceased to exist. He has flip-flopped on Iraq, gun ownership, social security and pretty much everything else. McCain has never given a straight answer in his entire run for the presidency in 2008. Yet you seem to love the man who promises nothing but more Bush failures. And now you claim that Obama, the man recognized by pretty much everyone as America's greatest modern orator, "can hardly put together a complete sentence in his own words?" That is the biggest pile of BS you have said yet.

And if you don't know what Obama means by hope and change, then the fault is your own for refusing to listen. Most of America knows by now what he means and they love it far better that John "Bush" McCain's promises of continued economic and foreign policy failure.


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1260 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by


These new-found tensions which are present at all stages in the real nature of colonialism have their repercussions on the cultural plane. In literature, for example, there is relative over-production. From being a reply on a minor scale to the dominating power, the literature produced by natives becomes differentiated and makes itself into a will to particularism. The intelligentsia, which during the period of repression was essentially a consuming public, now themselves become producers. This literature at first chooses to confine itself to the tragic and poetic style; but later on novels, short stories and essays are attempted. It is as if a kind of internal organisation or law of expression existed which wills that poetic expression become less frequent in proportion as the objectives and the methods of the struggle for liberation become more precise. Themes are completely altered; in fact, we find less and less of bitter, hopeless recrimination and less also of that violent, resounding, florid writing which on the whole serves to reassure the occupying power. The colonialists have in former times encouraged these modes of expression and made their existence possible. Stinging denunciations, the exposing of distressing conditions and passions which find their outlet in expression are in fact assimilated by the occupying power in a cathartic process. To aid such processes is in a certain sense to avoid their dramatisation and to clear the atmosphere. But such a situation can only be transitory. In fact, the progress of national consciousness among the people modifies and gives precision to the literary utterances of the native intellectual. The continued cohesion of the people constitutes for the intellectual an invitation to go farther than his cry of protest. The lament first makes the indictment; then it makes an appeal. In the period that follows, the words of command are heard. The crystallisation of the national consciousness will both disrupt literary styles and themes, and also create a completely new public. While at the beginning the native intellectual used to produce his work to be read exclusively by the oppressor, whether with the intention of charming him or of denouncing him through ethnical or subjectivist means, now the native writer progressively takes on the habit of addressing his own people.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify