Ed Fallon for Congress (IA-3)

In 2004 and 2006, I supported Leonard Boswell, Congressman from Iowa's third Congressional district. Boswell has been heavily targeted by the Republican party and tends to squeak by to victory. His age and health were issues in 2006. I supported him through it all.

This year I am supporting a primary challenger to Boswell with some reluctance. Bottom line is I am tired of having to defend the district against increasingly aggressive Republican challenges just waiting for Boswell to retire. The time for him to retire is now and there is an excellent alternative.

Ed Fallon is a progressive grassroots candidate endorsed by Democracy for America. Global warming and energy independence are among his main issues. He is running in the Democratic primary against Leonard Boswell. Boswell is a conservative Democrat but a good guy. But Boswell has been talking retirement for years now, and this has kept the Republicans hovering around this seat (IA-3) for years. Boswell is what the district USED to be. Fallon is more what it is today. Boswell recently survived a bout with cancer, and the Republicans targeted him heavily during that. I supported him then. But this seems like one near miss too many. It is time for a younger, more progressive, more forward thinking Democrat to take over this seat. I urge Boswell to take the retirement he has been talking about and endorse Ed Fallon. If Ed raises some good cash, Boswell just might do that.

Boswell is only a marginal Democrat on some issues. Or, more to the point, his voting record is all over the place, making him in many ways unreliable. On environmental issues he tends to only get around a 50% rating from the League of Conservation Voters (though 2007 he got 75%). On government reform he only gets around 45-50% from the PIRGs, something one might expect from an excessivly entrenched politician. His record on most issues is pretty good, but seldom excellent. His recent career is typical of a politician who has lost his drive and needs to retire.

Ed Fallon is an excellent Democrat who can take Boswell's place. From Fallon's website, he makes his case:

In the 2006 election, Americans said we were tired of the Bush Administration's policies. We wanted a new direction, so we elected a Democratic House and Senate. Yet on most of the key issues, this new majority has let America down. Simply stated, too many Congressional Democrats, including Congressman Leonard Boswell, vote too often with President Bush and against the priorities of the American people.

That's why I'm running for Congress. Our country needs and wants change. I'm ready to take on the corporate interests who have corrupted our federal government. I'm ready to give working families and the poor a voice in national politics. I'm ready to do what I can to see that environmental issues are taken seriously inside the beltway. I'm ready to apply what I've learned during 23 years of public service in Iowa and be a part of the new solution in Washington.

"I think Fallon may actually beat him, I really do.... Boswell doesn't fit that district very well.... [My students] think of him as the Iowa Barack Obama."
Prof. Steffen W. Schmidt, AKA "Dr. Politics", ISU Political Science Dep.

This is what I feel as well. Boswell USED to fit the district a long time ago. He now fails to inspire voters and has lost touch with the voters. Ed Fallon does fit the district as it is now. Check out his website and consider volunteering if you are in the IA-3 district. And you can donate through my Progressive Primaries Act Blue Site (where I feature several other good candidates).


mole333's picture

| | | | | | |

Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1875 guests online.

Online users

Words to live by

There's no question that in my lifetime, the contrast between what I called private affluence and public squalor has become very much greater. What do we worry about? We worry about our schools. We worry about our public recreational facilities. We worry about our law enforcement and our public housing. All of the things that bear upon our standard of living are in the public sector. We don't worry about the supply of automobiles. We don't even worry about the supply of foods. Things that come from the private sector are in abundant supply; things that depend on the public sector are widely a problem. We're a world, as I said in The Affluent Society, of filthy streets and clean houses, poor schools and expensive television. I consider that contrast to be one of my most successful arguments.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify