Joe Biden: Pro-Veteran, Pro-Labor, Pro-America

I often discuss candidates based on their past voting record, because let's face it, we want to know where candidates REALLY stand, not just what they say. I have previously exposed John McCain's right wing extremist voting record, including his consistently anti-choice, anti-Veteran, anti-farmer and anti-labor votes. Whatever McCain CLAIMS, his voting record shows he is not in touch with the mainstream of Americans. The National Jewish Democratic Council also compares McCain's extremist stands with Obama's moderate, mainstream stands. And the Sierra Club slams McCain on the environment. Even George Bush's own Pastor slams McCain's character and morals and endorses Obama.

What about Joe Biden, our next Vice President? I remember Biden from his 1988 run for President where he was impressive on paper, but uninspiring on the campaign trail. That was 20 years ago and I hear Biden has improved his style, and his experience in government is certainly impressive. But what about his voting record? How does his voting record compare with McCain's anti-choice, anti-Veteran, anti-farmer and anti-labor voting record? (data from Project Vote Smart)

On Veterans issues:

Senator Biden supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 75 percent in 2006, 92 percent in 2005, 100 percent in 2004. In 2006 Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America gave Senator Biden a grade of B+ (well above the D-C average for Republicans). Senator Biden supported the interests of the Non Commissioned Officers Association 100 percent in 2003 and 100 percent in 2002 (the most recent ratings I could find from this organization).

Senior and Social Security Issues:

Senator Biden supported the interests of the Alliance for Retired Americans 100 percent in 2007,100 percent in 2006, 80 percent in 2005 and 100 percent in 2004.

Labor Issues:

Senator Biden supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2007, 93 percent in 2006 and 100 percent in 2005. In 2007 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers gave Senator Biden a grade of 75, 80 percent in 2006 and 100 percent in 2005. Senator Biden supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 83 percent in 2007, 93 percent in 2006 and 92 percent in 2005. Senator Biden supported the interests of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers 87 percent in 2006 and 100 percent in 2005. Senator Biden supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 92 percent in 2006 and 93 percent in 2005.

Farmers:

Senator Biden supported the interests of the National Farmers Union 100 percent in 2005-2006 and 89 percent in 2003-2004. Senator Biden supported the interests of the National Council of Agricultural Employers 100 percent in 2005.

Social Issues:

In 2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy gave Senator Biden a grade of A+ and 88 percent in 2005 (I guess they changed their rating system between 2005 and 2006).

Women's Choice:

In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Senator Biden a grade of 75 and 100 percent in 2006. Senator Biden supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 2006. Senator Biden supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 93 percent in 2005-2006.

Biden's extensive experience and good voting record indicate he would be an excellent VP or even President. What remains to be seen is if he can be a better VP candidate than he was a Presidential candidate in 1988 and this year.


http://culturekitchen.com/mole333/blog/joe_biden_pro_veteran_pro_labor_pro_america
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
mole333's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
MICHELLEOBAMASTORE's picture

show your support of our future First Lady

GO TO:

WWW.MichelleObamaStore.com
Where we honor our future FIRST LADY!

In honor of MICHELLE OBAMA I've created a website where her supporters can purchase apparel and other goodies!! Get yours NOW!!!


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

Obama sketched out a different theory of social change than the one Clinton had implied earlier in the evening. Instead of relying on a president who fights for those who feel invisible, Obama, in the climactic passage of his speech, described how change bubbles from the bottom-up: “And because that somebody stood up, a few more stood up. And then a few thousand stood up. And then a few million stood up. And standing up, with courage and clear purpose, they somehow managed to change the world!”

For people raised on Jane Jacobs, who emphasized how a spontaneous dynamic order could emerge from thousands of individual decisions, this is a persuasive way of seeing the world. For young people who have grown up on Facebook, YouTube, open-source software and an array of decentralized networks, this is a compelling theory of how change happens.

Clinton had sounded like a traditional executive, as someone who gathers the experts, forges a policy, fights the opposition, bears the burdens of power, negotiates the deal and, in crisis, makes the decision at 3 o’clock in the morning.

But Obama sounded like a cross between a social activist and a flannel-shirted software C.E.O. — as a nonhierarchical, collaborative leader who can inspire autonomous individuals to cooperate for the sake of common concerns.

Clinton had sounded like Old Politics, but Obama created a vision of New Politics. And the past several months have revolved around the choice he framed there that night. Some people are enthralled by the New Politics, and we see their vapors every day. Others think it is a mirage and a delusion. There’s only one politics, and, tragically, it’s the old kind, filled with conflict and bad choices.


— David Brooks, A Defining Moment


Poll