March 25th, 1911: A Turning Point in the American Labor Movement

On March 25th 1911 (sorry, should have posted this yesterday!), 146 people died in the very building I work in. The result of their deaths was the rapid growth of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union and the real beginning of the fight against sweatshops. It also was the beginning of fire regulations in American cities.

The story of the fire and the missed opportunities to prevent it are chilling. But what is more chilling is the fact that America has forgotten why we need unions. Even some unions have forgotten what unions are all about, but I want everyone who doubts the need for unions to remember the events of March 25, 1911.

Image hosting by Photobucket

I work in what is now known as the Brown Building at NYU. But in 1911 it was the Asch building. The top three floors of the Asch building comprised the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory. For the record, a shirtwaist is essentially a woman's blouse. I work a couple of floors below where the factory was. Today I look out my lab's window and I see the annual commemoration of those who died in 1911.

This factory employed some 500 workers, mostly young women immigrants. The working conditions were essentially sweatshop conditions with fourteen-hour workdays and a 60- to 72-hour workweek. It was also a death trap. Workers of course smoked and lighting was from gas lighting...and, of course, the clothing was flammable. But it was even worse due to management distrust of the workers. One of the two exit stairs was locked to keep workers from taking breaks. The fire escape was substandard. And working conditions were crowded.

A couple of years before the fire, in 1909, a walkout by the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory workers sparked a large-scale labor protest, called the uprising of 20,000. When the management of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory locked out its striking employees, it led to a series of meetings of the industry's workers, leading to a much larger-scale walkout. Since a majority of the workers were Jewish immigrants, the large-scale action began with a Yiddish oath, that, roughly translated, means "if I break my oath may my hand wither away." Twenty thousand garment workers walked out for fourteen weeks.

All of the thuggery by management that typified the early labor movement was manifest. With police assistance, management hired thugs to beat up the striking women. An agreement was eventually reached, and, after an even larger strike in 1910, the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union was recognized.

But the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory refused to sign the agreement and conditions there scarcely improved.

On March 24, 1911, a fire began two floors above where I work. Workers on the tenth floor were alerted and escaped. But workers on the 9th floor were not. When the fire reached them, workers found doors locked. Some jumped out of windows to their deaths to escape the fire, an image that took on new meaning for me on 9/11 when many did the same at the much higher World Trade Center. Watching that happen, I found it overwhelming to imagine making the choice to jump. Other women jumped down the elevator shaft...mostly to their deaths. Others were overcome by smoke.

The rush of workers down the inadequate fire escape led to more deaths when the fire escape collapsed. When the fire department arrived, they found that their ladders were too short to reach above the 6th floor...the floor I work on.

In all 146 people died. Of those, 54 died jumping out of windows to escape the fire. You can read an eyewitness account of the fire here. It is somewhat disturbing especially after 9/11 because of the description of the falling bodies. Here is the most touching excerpt:

As I looked up I saw a love affair in the midst of all the horror. A young man helped a girl to the window sill. Then he held her out, deliberately away from the building and let her drop. He seemed cool and calculating. He held out a second girl the same way and let her drop. Then he held out a third girl who did not resist. I noticed that. They were as unresisting as if her were helping them onto a streetcar instead of into eternity. Undoubtedly he saw that a terrible death awaited them in the flames, and his was only a terrible chivalry.

Then came the love amid the flames. He brought another girl to the window. Those of us who were looking saw her put her arms about him and kiss him. Then he held her out into space and dropped her. But quick as a flash he was on the window sill himself. His coat fluttered upward--the air filled his trouser legs. I could see that he wore tan shoes and hose. His hat remained on his head.

Some 100,000 people attended the funeral of these victims. The factory owners were put on trial but acquitted. But the incidence radicalized the union movement, making their struggle a matter of life and death. When you hear people complain about unions, go back and re-read that eyewitness account of the fire and remember why the union movement began in the first place. I can personally tell you some complaints about certain unions and certain union members...but overall, anyone who knows the history of labor in America KNOWS that unions are the salvation of working class Americans.

The eyewitness account of the fire ends thus:

The floods of water from the firemen's hose that ran into the gutter were actually stained red with blood. I looked upon the heap of dead bodies and I remembered these girls were the shirtwaist makers. I remembered their great strike of last year in which these same girls had demanded more sanitary conditions and more safety precautions in the shops. These dead bodies were the answer.

My great-grandfather was a furniture maker who emigrated from Russia around the time of the anti-Jewish pogroms. He worked in a factory in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In that factory he lost two fingers and an eye in separate accidents. This was before the union movement. It is because of the union movement that such accidents are far less common.

The Asch building was bought by NYU and is now the Brown Building which, in turn, was joined up with two other buildings to be come the Silver Center, one of the main buildings of the university. A plaque remains on the Brown building commemorating the fire.

Many Americans still buy clothing made in sweatshops. But there are alternatives. I recommend purchasing clothing through No Sweat Apparel. Their clothing is very high quality and it is all made with union labor.

Finally, I will end by mentioning that the successor to the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union is the Union UNITE HERE which includes garment and hotel workers.


mole333's picture

| | |


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mrme's picture

Ah yes

Ah yes, when the left actually stood for something. What a sad tortuous journey they've taken from worker's rights to whining about "lies" and ice caps. (sigh)


mole333's picture

Well

Better than the right which went from advocating limited government to advocating dictatorship and an abandonment of the Constitution.

Whining about ice caps? Come on, Mr. Republican Drone, you still haven't faced up to the science. Yes, science. Care to actually address the ISSUE based on the FACTS rather than repeat Republican lies? The science is out there and it's sound.

As to lies, well remember that evidence that there were WMD in Iraq? The Iraq invasion would "pay for itself?" Just to name a couple. When did Republicans become so accepting of dishonesty? Oh, yeah. THAT particular Republican wart dates back to Nixon.


mrme's picture

wa wa wa

I'm not a Republican.
The WMD info was largely wrong, but it wasn't a lie.
As for science, I hit you on another post, telling you I saw that brilliant British Gore-debunk film and i asked you to deny specific scientific facts. It doesn't matter. For you, Bush-hate and "global warming" are a religion and facts could never dissuade you.


mole333's picture

Ummm

Can't believe you persist even when told you are wrong complete with scientific evidence.

WMD was a lie. They were told that Chalabi was unreliable but they used him anyway, contrary to the advise of our own intelligence.

And I did a whole diary on how the very scientist used in that British show to supposedly debunk global warming has repudiated the show saying he DISAGREED with the show. Here's the link to the diary and here is the quote from the scientist that the British show tried to misuse: (since you seem to ignore it)

I believe that climate change is real, a major threat, and almost surely has a major human-induced component...

The science of climate change remains incomplete. Some elements are so firmly based on well-understood principles, or for which the observational record is so clear, that most scientists would agree that they are almost surely true (adding CO2 to the atmosphere is dangerous; sea level will continue to rise,...). Other elements remain more uncertain, but we as scientists in our roles as informed citizens believe society should be deeply concerned about their possibility: failure of US midwestern precipitation in 100 years in a mega-drought; melting of a large part of the Greenland ice sheet, among many other examples.

I am on record in a number of places complaining about the over-dramatization and unwarranted extrapolation of scientific facts. Thus the notion that the Gulf Stream would or could "shut off" or that with global warming Britain would go into a "new ice age" are either scientifically impossible or so unlikely as to threaten our credibility...They also are huge distractions from more immediate and realistic threats....

In the part of the "Swindle" film where I am describing the fact that the ocean tends to expel carbon dioxide where it is warm, and to absorb it where it is cold, my intent was to explain that warming the ocean could be dangerous---because it is such a gigantic reservoir of carbon. By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human influence must not be very important --- diametrically opposite to the point I was making --- which is that global warming is both real and threatening in many different ways, some unexpected...

What we now have is an out-and-out propaganda piece, in which there is not even a gesture toward balance or explanation of why many of the extended inferences drawn in the film are not widely accepted by the scientific community. There are so many examples, it's hard to know where to begin, so I will cite only one: a speaker asserts, as is true, that carbon dioxide is only a small fraction of the atmospheric mass. The viewer is left to infer that means it couldn't really matter. But even a beginning meteorology student could tell you that the relative masses of gases are irrelevant to their effects on radiative balance. A director not intending to produce pure propaganda would have tried to eliminate that piece of disinformation.

I predicted that the British Swindle would become the new right wing nut talking point. And you show me I was right. But the British Swindle has no factual basis. Once again, let me point out that not one single reputable scientist disagrees with the basic outlines of the anthropogenic global warming theory. And there has never been one single peer-reviewed paper published that doesn't support the anthropogenic global warming theory. Details are open to debate, but not the basics.

The one time you tried to argue based on actual facts, you cited a non-scientific source that had only a small part of the picture and made false claims about it. I spent quite a bit of time presenting you with the more complete data and showing why the non-scientific source you cited was wrong. Let me remind you of that discussion, which can be found in the comments in this diary.

So, you continue to show a lack of understanding of science. Why not learn something before you speak about it?


minjofromcocomo's picture

Thank you very much for

Thank you very much for posting this article. A few weeks ago my women's studies class was discussing the working conditions in sweatshops and possible solutions to these problems. I plan to look into purchasing clothes from No Sweat Apparel so that I can do my part to put an end to the sweatshop business.


mole333's picture

You're welcome!

Glad you found it useful!


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 922 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by


The primaries are in a very true sense a practice run for the White House, and if you emerge with high marks, as Obama has, it's a pretty clear statement of the kind of government you would run. Obama has shown a steadiness in demeanor and message. Clinton has blown through $120 million dollars, and her persona is more confused than ever.


— Eleanor Clift, Day of Reckoning For Clinton


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify