Surfing Somalia: How Many Missed Opportunities

Current TV, Al Gore's innovative TV channel, has done some pretty amazing things. They got film crews into North Korea, into places in Iraq far from the Green Zone, and were the first journalists into a Somalia arms market before the Islamic Fundamentalists took Mogadishu. It is their willingness to go where most journalists don't have the balls to go that makes the network worth watching.

Back when they went in to film Mogadishu in chaos, with battling warlords and their factions making arms dealing a major industry, it was astonishing the constant aura of threat that permeated Mogadishu under the warlords. These are the people Clinton had nearly defeated, but lack of Congressional support led to a withdrawal that allowed a resurgence of chaos. And Bush sat back allowing that chaos to happen, making the Islamic Fundamentalists the ONLY option Somalis had for stability.

When I participated in a live radio broadcast some months back discussing the initial takeover by the Islamic Fundamentalists, most of the Somalis who participated considered the Islamic takeover a good thing for one reason: it promised stability. They expressed their appreciation for the American intervention and a sense of betrayal at the American withdrawal. In the absence of American influence, they saw the fundamentalists as the only way to end the chaos.

And so Mogadishu and the whole Southern half of Somalia fell to fundamentalists and Bush did nothing. By and large the Western Press did nothing but report from a distance. But CurrentTV went in to see what life was like under the Somali Taliban.

Throughout their segment it is clear that the CurrentTV crew were the only Westerners around, and so were constantly targets for the wrath of people angry at the US. Two things struck me about the CurrentTV film: first, that the stability that the fundamentalists had imposed seemed real, but very fragile. Everyone was still armed and danger threatened constantly. But the city was starting to run again, with a lovely beach being safe enough to swim in for the first time in a decade (with one of the CurrentTV crew eagerly diving in to body surf) and the first public prayer gathering in 15 years. People were hopeful that better things were ahead even if it meant a theocracy.

Chaos or theocratic dictatorship. After awhile, chaos gets pretty damned awful and even theocratic dictatorship looks good. Many Somalis were opting for that...but the choice wasn't really theirs.

With the US mired in the Iraq quagmire and eyeing another insane war in neighboring Iran, Bush did nothing to stem the expansion of Islamic Fundamentalists in Somalia. It fell to Ethiopia, with a small amount of air-support from the US, to drive out the fundamentalists who I refer to as the Somali Taliban.

And make no mistake, despite protestations of being moderates, the Islamic Fundamentalists who were driven out by Ethiopia after our long neglect of the area showed every indication of following the path of the Taliban. I have no reason to mourn the defeat of the Somali Taliban...but the Somalis who found them to be the only force that gave them even a vague stability may well miss their presence.

As Ethiopia withdraws its troops, violence once again escalates, and the old anarchy of libertarian/warlord rule with no central authority threatens to return. Meanwhile, Ethiopia's intervention against the Islamic Fundamentalists in Somalia threatens to re-ignite their long-standing war with Eritrea, which supports the fundamentalists.

So, with ongoing chaos in Somalia and threats of a wider, regional war, what will the US do? Will they finally turn their attention to this area the way Bill Clinton advised, helping to stabilize the area? Or will they once again sit back after a brief, violent intervention and let warlords and fundamentalists fight it out, once again leaving the people of Somalia with no choice but to seek stability with a Taliban-style regime? With Mr. Bush at the helm, it is doubtful that we will do anything meaningful to stabilize the area, thus ensuring that al-Qaeda can function in the Horn of Africa just as freely as it has throughout Bush's watch. So much for the war on terrorism. We're too busy picking fights with nations that had nothing to do with the 9/11 plot but have everything to do with oil profits. And so the Somali tragedy continues.

http://culturekitchen.com/mole333/blog/surfing_somalia_how_many_missed_opportunities
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
No votes yet
mole333's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Smith's picture

Thanks mole333 - we're

Thanks mole333 - we're really proud of this piece. It can be seen here.

blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

You're welcome!!!

You SHOULD be proud of it! I am a bit too old to fit in the main demographics of CurrentTV, so a lot of the fashion and snow boarding stuff doesn't interest me...but when CurrentTV does real journalism they do it a damned lot better than the MSM does. Comparing CurrentTV's surreal but believable segment filmed in North Korea with the MSM propoganda piece filmed in North Korea (forget which channel) both conveyed the same eerie message but CurrentTV did it without warmed over Cold War cliches.

Thanks for coming by! Please visit and post anytime! And I will happily plug good Current TV pods when I get the chance. Last one I plugged was the Korean/black interracial couple, an excellent pod that deals with so many issues that need to be discussed.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

"Does art serve no purpose if it cannot serve an explicit agenda like “social justice?” In recent years, we have seen public service announcements by celebrities touting the benefits of arts education in elementary schools because it supposedly helps make better mathematicians or physicists out of children. Perhaps the point ought to be that arts education makes for better artists. Perhaps we ought to stop being so apologetic about art and not keep trying to wrap its trembling shoulders with that raggedy shawl of self-righteousness and instead advocate for public school funding that incorporates all aspects of education. Perhaps we ought to accept the fact that artists may produce work that is disinterested in social change, and put some of the burden back on the state to effect the kind of social change we want."

From, We, on the left, may not have the billionaires of the right via @adelenieves and @mamitamala

— GuerrillaMama

Poll