The Death of the Eisenhower Republican

There was a time, barely remembered today, when the idea of bipartisanship really seemed reasonable. There was once a kind of Republican, now driven to the verge of extinction, called the "Eisenhower Republican." Today, the equivalent beast would be called a "Moderate Democrat." The Republican Party itself has largely purged itself of Eisenhower Republicans in its radical shift to the right.

I have always been a Democrat. But even the earliest President I remember, Richard Nixon, though a crazy, paranoid, power hungry SOB, could be ideologically reasonable, as evidenced by his establishment of the EPA. But Nixon, probably unintentionally, began the decline of the Eisenhower Republican. Some of those he brought into government are the very same "barking crazy rightwingers" who have systematically been destroying our nation under Bush. That, combined with Nixon's spectacular and televised downfall, discredited the reasonable, moderate Republican. The Democrats, then more liberal than now, were ready to take advantage of Nixon's downfall, and the far right wing Republicans, then marginalized but poised to strike, were ready to begin their plans to take over the nation through lying, stealing and cheating.

One man had a small chance of saving the Eisenhower Republican: President Gerald Ford.

Gerald Ford, the last of the Eisenhower Republicans who had any chance of saving the Republican Party from the barking crazy rightwingers, has died.

Gerald Ford had been a well-respected Congressman, someone who could work with both parties to get things done. As criminal charges consumed Nixon and his administration, Gerald Ford was the last chance Republicans had of restoring respectability. Centrist, traditionalist and all around nice guy, Ford might have been the only person who could have saved the Republican Party from being taken over by extremists or lapsing into obscurity.

Pardoning Nixon and the stagflation Ford inherited from Nixon pretty much made it impossible for Ford to succeed. In the end, a moderate Democrat (Jimmy Carter) defeated Ford for President, and the right wing fringe of the Republican Party swept in to destroy the Eisenhower Republicans and take over. Those right wing nutcases have not only gone to great lengths to destroy our Constitution and to run up the biggest budget deficits in hitsory, but have also by now alienated moderate Republicans. The death of the Eisenhower branch of the Republican Party was one reason why Democrats won this year.

And with the Republican Party now nearly completely dominated by anti-democracy, right wing fools, and with Democrats winning by appealing to American moderates, Gerald Ford, at the age of 93, has died.

America has always been and should remain a two-party system. Why? Because we, as a culture, divide pretty solidly into Federalist and State's Rights camps...strict interpretation vs. loose interpretation of the Constitution... These are very real ambiguities within our system, left ambiguous by those who formed our government, and it is the give and take between these two views of government that has made our nation strong. The big danger now is that one party, the Republicans, have been taken over by a group that believes in neither of these philosophies of government except as a way of fooling voters. Instead, the barking crazy rightwingers have, in essence, thrown the whole Constitutional dichotomy out the window and have tried instituting a one-party, Soviet system of crony capitalism, corruption and war profiteering.

I have always been a Democrat and almost certainly will remain a Democrat for life. Why? Because I like the fact that the Democratic Party represents America's diversity in almost every way and, by and large, is more representative of the average American than the more elitist, pro-wealthy Republican Party has been since Harding's time. You'd have to go back before Harding before I would consider the Republican Party more representative of my views than the Democratic Party.

But I respect a healthy, moderate Republican Party, the Eisenhower Republicans, to balance the two-party American system. That is why Ford's failure to hold the line against the right wing extremists within the Republican Party is a shame and why I am saddened by Ford's death.

Since Ford's presidency, the entire track of the Republican Party has been towards more and more extremism, more and more lies, more and more greed, and more and more corruption. Almost every traditional, Eisenhower Republican ideal has been thrown out by the barking crazy rightwingers, as the three largest deficits in our history came from Reagan, the elected Bush and the current little Bush and as the idea of "small government" has been thrown out the window in a greedy rush to publicly fund the corrupt military-industrial-religious extremist complex.

I can only hope that the Republican Party can rediscover its Gerald Ford/Dwight Eisenhower side and reject the extremists who currently control their Party.


http://culturekitchen.com/mole333/blog/the_death_of_the_eisenhower_republican
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None
mole333's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
blog comments powered by Disqus ">
PoliticalCritic's picture

Ford

Ford would've been better off accepting the invitation to play for the Green Bay Packers or Detroit Lions. Now that's a great life. Who turns down the NFL? Playing football for money is a beautiful thing.

Instead, he becomes President and pardons a man who belonged in jail. He didn't do it to move the country ahead. He did it to save the Republican party from more disgrace.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
pops's picture

Jerry Was Just Fine By Me!

When Bob Dole ran for president most people thought he was nuts when he said his only real agenda was to get the govt organized and put in better shape. As such he was the last national voice that represented the old Republican ideal that govt works best when it works efficiently. Guys like Dole and Ford had nothing against what used to be called the safety net. They thought that welfare was fine just as long as it got to the people who needed it at a low cost.

The question here is how did we go from wanting a govt that works effciently to a govt so small, as Grover Nordquist has said, that it could be drown in a bathtub?

Govt wasn't the enemy to guy like Jerry Ford, it was a tool that could be used to really help people's lives. Under him there was LEAA - the Law Enforcement Assistance Act that standardized the road signs (i.e. merge left, ped xing etc) and let local police buy better communications equipment.

Jerry was a hell of a president. When I was 18 I went to the draft office and signed up. Six months later I got a letter say that President Gerald R. Ford signed an executive order indefinitely suspending the draft. No further action was required on my part, but I had to carry my draft card until I was 24. Thus I was free to have a legal ID that got me cigs and beer without ever having to have a single thought about unnecessary foreign entabglements.

Thanks Jerry.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Tara Parks's picture

Ford: RIP

nice writing, Mole333.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
SteamGeek's picture

RE Ford from Michigan

Aside from the "customary" pardon Ford provided Nixon, if I'm not mistaken he had a rather long and distinguished career in Government, while also never being dragged thru the mud or having his reputation sullied.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ford

Considering Ford's pardon of Nixon, how do we measure the ethics of the hundreds of questionable pardons granted by Clinton in his final hours in office?

Is there some sort of double standard here?


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
Bruce Holt's picture

Great Post - Death of the Eisenhower Republican

My background: I was an active Republican in the Philadelphia suburbs from when I was a teenager until age 36. My mother was very active as an Eisenhower/Nixon/Ford moderate Republican, but by 1992, both my late parents were strong Bill Clinton supporters. In 1976, my mother and I attended a local rally where Jack Ford, son of the late president, spoke. Right-wing Ronald Reagan selfishly challenged the sitting President Ford and weakened him enough that the Democrats were able to win the presidency. The radical policies of huge tax cuts that also benefited the wealthy began a reversal of the policies begun during the New Deal and largely continued by Dwight D. Eisenhower and Richard Nixon. With dismay, I saw Reagan begin packing the courts with choices favored by Jesse Helms and others of the Far Right.
How have the moderate Republicans in the Philadelphia suburbs responded to the shift of the GOP to the mostly white, older and far right leaders? In 1992, at the dawn of Bill Clinton's rise, the Republicans led the Democrats 60%-31% in the suburbs. As of last Nov, both parties hold 43% of the registrations, a seismic shift in politics. In 1988, the Democrats only took 38% of the presidential vote, but last year took an astounding 58%.


blog comments powered by Disqus ">
mole333's picture

Thanks

I am a solid Democrat, raised by solid Democrats. We came from the long tradition of Jewish liberals. My step-father started with the most conservative leanings, mainly anti-Communist tirades. But he was otherwise liberal despite a long, distinguished military career spanning WW II and Korea. Retired Lt. Col. and he taught at West Point. By his death he was more liberal than I, and an avid fan of The Nation. It was Reagan who shifted him left.

I am liberal...with moderate leanings, I guess, since I hold the second amendment as important as the first, despite not being a gun owner, and I am not necessarily against the death penalty, though I am against the unfair ways it is being used.

To me American history has been a two party history, and although I am a Democrat, I want a Republican party that is a true, reasonable, sane alternative to my party. I don't want a Republican party that is insane, greedy and corrupt. I want a foe I can respect, not what we had for 8 years...and more.

Reagan had his own personal good qualities. But the policies he set in motion have brought us to near collapse under this Bush. I hope the Republicans re-find themselves and come back towards sanity.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/4">interwiki</a>.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

The much vaunted Clinton campaign operation, billed as the biggest, baddest game in town, had no post-Super Tuesday strategy because its leaders apparently didn't think one was needed. Whether that's due to arrogance or ignorance, it's the campaign equivalent of what President Bush did in invading Iraq without a post-Saddam plan.


— Eleanor Clift, Day of reckoning


Poll