Why Do Republicans Hate our Troops?

This comes from Americans Against Escalation in Iraq:

Like the majority of Americans, many of our brave men and women who have served in Iraq are calling for an end to the war. But on Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh called troops who favor Iraq withdrawal “phony soldiers”, sparking outrage across the nation...

“Limbaugh’s outrageous statement is emblematic of a party which has been out of touch with the American people on the war in Iraq every step of the way,” said Moira Mack, spokeswoman for Americans Against Escalation in Iraq. “While the vast majority of Americans want our troops brought home safely, President Bush and his allies continue to block a safe end to the war in Iraq. Americans are fed up. President Bush and Republican members of Congress should immediately denounce the offensive statement and demand an apology on behalf of America’s veterans and military families who have sacrificed so much.”

Limbaugh’s outrageous statement comes on the heels of House Republican Leader John Boehner’s remark that the U.S. is paying “a small price” in Iraq. The anger over Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner’s comments that the costs of the war and the sacrifices of our troops in Iraq are a “small price” continues unabated around the country.

Americans Against Escalation in Iraq today released youtube video testimonials from Iraq war veterans and military family members denouncing Boehner’s remark and calling on Congressional Republicans to demand an apology from Boehner. Boehner’s statement sparked a backlash against him and his fellow republicans since 3,800 U.S. soldiers have been killed in Iraq, 28,000 more have been injured or wounded and about $452 billion has been spent.

Here are a selection of responses to the comments made by Limbaugh and Boehner and other Republican extremists:

From a retired general in New Mexico:


From Maine:


From Michigan:


From Minnesota:


From Iowa:


From Kentucky:


From Pennsylvania:



mole333's picture

|


Visit our sponsors

Upcoming events

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Buy it!


Visit our sponsors

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Google Ads

The Big Dialog


Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 1267 guests online.

Online users

Instant Congress

Don't know your Senators or US Representatives' phone numbers?
Enter your street address and zip code and find out right now.
Street number and name only:
Zip Code (5 digits):


Words to live by

Clinton had to raise the stakes by raising the bar: It’s Tuesday or bust.

And along with victimhood, Clinton has finally found a powerful theme, the same theme that George W. Bush used at his convention and in his reelection campaign in 2004: Vote for me or die.

With her “3 a.m. phone call” ad, she is saying exactly what Bush said: I will protect you and your children, and the other guy will not.

Yes, there is irony in a Democrat trying to getting the nomination by adopting a Republican tactic, but, hey, you know what? It worked back then, and Clinton is betting it will work now.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify