Giuliani Channels Karl Rove: More Republican Lies
[Editor's Note: While I am on vacation I am reposting some old articles I consider still relavent. For those who care about truth rather than Republican lies, let's look at the real Rudy Giuliani.]
Rudy Giuliani has just shown that he is as much a lying fearmonger as Karl Rove or any other Bush administration toady. From Politico:
Rudy Giuliani said if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001.
But if a Republican is elected, he said, especially if it is him, terrorist attacks can be anticipated and stopped.
“If any Republican is elected president —- and I think obviously I would be the best at this —- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what [the terrorists] will do and try to stop them before they do it,†Giuliani said.
Ummmm...let's review some history, Rudy. Ronald Reagan and the elected Bush both SUPPORTED the Muslim fanatics that evolved into al-Qaeda. Bill Clinton is the one who first recognized them as a threat and tried to get them. The attack he ordered after the bombing of the USS Coles hit the location where bin Laden had JUST LEFT. The Clinton administration PREVENTED the millenium attacks. Clinton was so focused on getting al-Qaeda that the Republicans called him "obsessed" with al-Qaeda and he TOLD Bush that al-Qaeda would be the number one focus of Bush's administration.
Now let's look at Bush's administration: he ignored the warnings, let 9/11 happened, and he has consistently ignored the continuing al-Qaeda threat and instead invaded Iraq, a nation with absolutely NO TIES to al-Qaeda before we invaded. Experts around the world agree that we are LESS SAFE THAN EVER because of Bush's failed foreign policy.
So, Republicans SUPPORTED the groups that became al-Qaeda, Clinton attacked al-Qaeda, Bush ignored them, allowing them to attack America. So WHICH party is more likely to stop an attack, the Democrats who were "obsessed" with stopping al-Qaeda or the Republicans who supported and then ignored them?
And while we are at it, let's not forget something about Rudy himself. Rudy Giuliani wants us all to think of him as the 9/11 candidate, but the TRUE heroes of 9/11, the firefighters, detest the man, refusing to even invite him to a presidential candidate's forum that ALL the other candidates, Republican AND Democratic, were invited to. Personally, I would rather support our firefighters than the lying chickenhawk Giuliani who seems ready to repeat all the worst mistakes of the Bush administration. America wants change. Both McCain and Giuliani have shown that they represent more of the same old failures.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
2008 Elections | 9/11 | firefighters | Barking Crazy Right Wingers | Republic Party
liar, liar, liar
Submitted by bigassbelle (not verified) on 4 July 2007 - 6:53pm.
this man frightens me. he is just another version of the conscienceless, superficial, arrogant, chest-thumping fool we already have. he operates on fear and hubris and a lust for power. his glory days ~ when he was on the news day after day ~ are over and he longs for the past. this is the last, very last, candidate we need to even consider for what is going to be a lengthy and difficult restoration of the republic, ruined by the current crop of criminals and thieves and arrogant fools.
Which Party
Submitted by JJ Ross on 4 July 2007 - 7:26pm.
is the totally wrong question imo, the one that will ruin us all if we can't get unstuck from -- as in.
"So WHICH party is more likely to stop an attack . . ."
Well
Submitted by mole333 on 7 July 2007 - 2:04pm.
Sometimes I might agree with you. But in a case where one party really was focused on such an attack and the other did all it could to ignore it, to refuse to recognize the difference in approach is even more problematic than lumping the parties together. Sometimes it really is appropriate to recognize something a political party does right and what another political party does wrong.
liars, liars, liars
this man frightens me. he is, if one can even imagine such a horrible thing, even worse than the current resident of the oval office. arrogance, hubris, a superficial approach to complex and difficult problems, a chest-thumping macho based on nothing more than time and place and proximity to a disaster that MIGHT HAVE BEEN prevented had bush and his band of thugs bothered to pay attention.