Obama: The Democratic Messiah?
Obama: The Democratic Messiah?
Joel S. Hirschhorn
What a wonderful political distraction is Senator Barack Hussein Obama. Perhaps a good part of his attractiveness is that he is in so many ways the complete opposite of George W. Bush.
Yet, what amazes me is how our bipartisan obstacle to true political competition continually creates illusions of change and reform. Thus it keeps a grip on Americans’ hope for the future, and preempts public support for more profound political change. Is Obama just another example of how our corrupt political system ingeniously creates candidates to keep hope alive? Is the self-professed progressive Obama the real thing? Is he something other than a conventional politician? I have read many of his speeches and other statements. I applaud his upbeat rhetoric, but few policy details are given.
Joseph Sobran opined that “the Democrats are looking for a political messiah, and many of them think they’ve found one in Illinois’s junior senator, Barack Obama. And Obama is, without question, a very charming, intelligent, and impressive young man who is, moreover, catnip to the press corps.†Cal Thomas made the good point that many Americans look at presidential candidates as political messiahs. He said Obama “can also play dual roles of messiah figure and one of the Wise Men.†And he astutely asked: “Have political ‘messiah figures’ become false gods?â€
In truth, none of the current presidential hopefuls have obtained the political messiah mantle as much as Obama has.
Yet I remain skeptical. Is he willing to do whatever it takes to become President? In our diseased political system, whatever-it-takes-candidacy produces screw-the-public-politics-as-usual. Here are some things that would truly impress me about Obama’s uniqueness, and that would support viewing him as something other than just another opportunistic politician – albeit with a race, good looks, anti-Iraq war, and intelligence advantage.
First and foremost, I would be deeply impressed if Obama soon committed to taking campaign contributions only from individuals and only in small amounts, say no greater than $50. Because if he raised the huge amount of money necessary for a competitive presidential campaign – say $100 million – from the usual sources, then he will inevitably become (assuming he is not already) corrupted.
Second, his voting record in the Senate shows a strong allegiance to labor and teacher unions, according to data from Project Vote Smart. These groups can be hugely important sources of big campaign money. I would like to hear Obama explicitly pronounce policy positions that show he is not a lackey of organized labor.
Third, he has supported the views of the Population Connection, better known by its former name: Zero Population Growth.. One of its core positions is: “The only acceptable solution to the population problem is through expanding educational, advocacy and service efforts that lower birth rates.†Additionally, for the United States it advocates “efforts to conserve energy and natural resources and improve efficiency, eliminate our ‘disposable society’ lifestyle, and use the best possible technology to protect the natural and human environment.†I would be impressed if Obama spoke out about the compulsive consumerism hallmarking U.S. culture. And if he solidly supported higher gasoline taxes and stricter vehicle mileage standards to promote less driving and gasoline use. Besides favoring abortion rights and backing the interests of Planned Parenthood, what else does he support to cut global population growth?
Forth, he has demonstrated little support for the policy goals of the National Taxpayers Union, that lobbies for “the merits of limited government and low taxes,†fights corporate welfare and tax advantages for the wealthy, and advocates for a balanced budget amendment to the constitution. Similarly, his record shows little support for what the Americans for Tax Reform groups advocates. A core position of this group is: “Politicians often run for office saying they won't raise taxes, but then quickly turn their backs on the taxpayer. The idea of the Pledge is simple enough: Make them put their no-new-taxes rhetoric in writing.†So, this is what I would like to hear from Obama: tell us you are not a free-spending liberal that will easily justify raising taxes to increase funding for social programs. And that you will fight for a balanced budget constitutional amendment – in fact, be the first presidential candidate ever to advocate for an Article V convention of state delegates to consider this and other possible amendments!
Fifth, his views on illegal immigration are very consistent with those of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and opposite to those of groups working to stop the massive influx of illegal immigration. Has he bought into labor union’s desire for more members, despite illegals lowering wages for working-class American citizens, just what corporate interests want? Does he favor ANY strict measures to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants, including stiffer penalties for illegal employers? What would he do to combat the plight of local governments facing high costs from illegal immigrants?
Obama says “America is a land of big dreamers and big hopes.†Then please tell us – exactly and soon – what are YOUR big dreams and big hopes for America that you intend to pursue if you become President. Give us details that differentiate you not just from the other presidential candidates, but from all conventional politicians that have lost the trust and confidence of most Americans. You say “we need the political will.†For what exactly? Not just the big, broad goals, but tell us the “how†– the policy paths that you will fight for to reach lofty goals.
I don’t care that he has little government and no executive experience, not if he is willing to boldly speak out with specifics about exactly what he would try to accomplish as President.
Cynic though I am, if he really is the Democratic messiah, then as an American I would be very happy. But I share Cal Thomas’ skepticism: “What puzzles me is why so many people put their hopes in politicians, when politicians (and politics) repeatedly let them down.â€
I want Obama to speak with such clarity that he either earns the messiah label, or makes realists of even his strongest supporters. We do not need another political false idol, from the left or the right.
Candidate Watching | Progressive politics | Senator Barrack Obama
Obama is this cycle's "man from hope"
Barack Obama is this year's "man from hope", just as Bill Clinton was in 1992 and Howard Dean in 2004, the fresh faced outsider riding in wearing a white hat to take on the corrupt establishment.
The netroots carries presidential campaigning up until the primaries start and there is every reason to believe Obama might be the darling of cyberspace this year just as Dean was four years ago. This because the 'net is propelled by younger voters, and Obama is the only candidate I see out there right now who is going to naturally appeal to those age 18-30. Hillary is nearly sixty now, if you are in college, she and Bill Clinton were your parents candidates. Most of the other candidates are in their fifties. Obama is 45. His age and the idea that his politics are less rooted in the sixties, an era fewer and fewer young kids identify with now, than in the 70's, 80's, 90's, is going to appeal to the college demographic.
I have attended a couple of Obama's book signings at Barnes and Noble and at both events, there were throngs of young people overjoyed to see him and begging him to run. They identify with him. He is their "man from hope" Hillary Clinton has much more of a challenge in trying to connect with younger voters and independent-minded voters than Obama does, because she has been around so long and is such a well known member of the establishment. In this regard, Obama's lack of experience plays in his favor.
Obama's problem is that he is going to have people on the right, such as the author of this item, portraying him as way too liberal while many on the left are going to think he's not liberal enough. Right now Edwards seems to be running the farthest to the left, with Obama in the center, and Hillary right of center. It will be interesting to see if this holds up over the course of the year.
Battle of the Generations heating up!
When Baby Boomers (the Clintons) were espousing flower power, burning bras and draft cards, and talking of the peace movement, they also advised us old folks that they didn't trust anyone over 30. Now they sit in Congress and most board rooms and learned the world is flat. Not all. Some still think of other matters than approaching retiredment, medical insurance, and the value of 401Ks. Their kids who started out in the late 60s wonder what all the fuss was about, whether we talk history of civil rights or VietNam. Persoanl freedom is a requirement but the global/military/economic establishment is not quite as certain. Forty- somethings have parents who are worrying about getting old, grandparents who are old, and children who live with MySpace and ipods.
But that is such a wild generalization. Some recent high school graduates do know what a bill of habeous corpus is, and some Forty-Somethings care enough about politics to leave the long grass and dirty dishes at home for a political rally.
It's said that breakdown in family discussion of politics came with the microwave and order-in pizza.
Maybe E-campaigners, regardless of age, should logoff and just go out and take political temperatures once a day. In the Kerry campaign I heard over and over that "he doesn't speak to what matters to me." Listening is vital for communication and would probably help a person's cause more than all the T-shirts from China.
Obama strategies available via weekly podcast
Anybody who's curious about precisely what solutions Obama is proposing to the various problems noted in the post above can get his weekly podcasts from iTunes.
Also, signing up on Obama's (not senatorial, but presidential) website results in the occasional reminders about legislative solutions he is currently proposing, among other things. A sample, below, received today:
Most Americans believe that escalation will not bring the war in Iraq to a responsible end, and that's why I've proposed not just a troop cap, but a phased redeployment that will start bringing our troops home.
Most Americans believe that energy independence will come from using more biofuels like ethanol and making cars that actually use less oil, which is why I proposed a bipartisan plan that would raise fuel economy standards for the first time in decades.
Podcasts are big this year. Wow!
I wrote a longer, more serious message about the whims of Chicago politics as I observed them for 22 years.The mouse ate it.
But, really. It's more interesting to think of what the younger generation demands. Sound bytes (my preferred spelling) are out. The 5-minute flick is in. I saw Edwards rebutting the State of the Union speech. I saw Feingold telling the Senate how to proceed on constitutional matters. And, thinking back to Elizabeth Holtzman's impeachment lecture, I picked up a 3-part YouTube. It's going to be hard on candidates next year. They'll tramp the cornfields and then come back to do their idea of the nightly news. My big hope is that they tell us what's on their minds, instead of sending surrogates.
Obama vs H. Clinton? Hillary does best when she can make a regal entry. How she'll do that on MySpace beats me.
Somewhere I must have opined about how youth is great for getting new ideas started. But will they carry through when election day comes? I try not to show my horse and buggy beginnings. Couldn't everyone go down to the courthouse and send an email to the data base in Iowa or Bombay or whereever. And if some don't want to travel, they could stay at home and send their vote on a secure line?
Now what does the public think of that?






























Obama is going to need a think skin
Salon.com wrote a piece to prove that Obama is white, culturally speaking. But actually a piece to counteract the muck that is flying from the right. Insight magazine carries the makings of bad beginning for Obama and Hillary and MSM is picking up on it. Bob Parry has a good article yesterday in Consortiumnews on the part the Moonies are playing in this. \
I think 2007 has just been cancelled and dirt is flying as though it were February 2008.
What may save us from the lure of sidetracks is a good case of wondering what those two Chicagoans have in their "issues" package.