This Pirate Won't Loot the Food



  

Each time that Keira Knightley doesn't eat, a plate of clumpy rice is donated to starving children across the world:



  



  



  



  

These two little troublemakers even got to eat something besides clumpy rice inside the shelter:



  

GOD BLESS THE STARVING RICH.


Tara Parks's picture

| | | | | | | | | | | | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
liza's picture

oh no you didn't!

oh man!

you went there. you totally went there!

you know, it's weird but i had a sociology professor say once that only in the US would the poor people be fat and the rich people emaciated.

why the f*ck? what is that all about?


Soylent Green's picture

I was surfing on the net,

I was surfing on the net, and found your site. I like your articles


Tara Parks's picture

Culture Kitchen thanks you!

please come back to read more of our work!

Tara


Tara Parks's picture

Culture Kitchen thanks you!

please come back to read more of our work!

Tara


Visit our sponsors

Fill up our coffee fund

BlogAds

Visit our sponsors

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 1231 guests online.

Get our Digestifs du jour

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

culturekitchens

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Member's articles and stories

More stories

Words to live by

I've essentially been driven out of activism, and being gainfully employed is much more attractive than being marginalized. Note this doesn't mean there are no benefits - it means it's not worth the costs. The fact that the skeptical side considers a weighing of positives and negatives, while the marketing side seems to follow a cultist reinforcement of only favorable evidence, inclines me to believe that the skeptical side is right and the marketing side is wrong.


Subscribe Buttons

Feed IconGoogleDeliciousYahoo!BloglinesNewsgatorMSNFeedsterAOLFurlRojoNewsburstPluckFeedFeedsAdd KinjaMultiRSSrMailRSSFwdBlogarithmSimplify