Texas

Machismo at Work : Members of the CHC who voted for the Stupak Amendment and against women's rights

As we noted before, 64 Democrats voted against women's right to health insurance funded abortion procedures. Many of these Democrats have claimed the ultimate fallacy: That proponents of forced pregnancy shouldn't "pay with their tax money" for abortions because it infringes on their civil liberties. As if anti-war activists and pacifists could claim the same when it comes to funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and any other wars they oppose.

Yet I'd like to focus on the "hispanics" that voted against women's rights. Long-time readers now that even though I am a proud  Puerto Rican and blatina, I've never been one to shy away from writing about the ugliness and even atrocities perpetrated by Latin Americans. It should come as no surprise my willingness to call out these so-called Hispanics and Latinos of dubiosity. Particularly since in Latin America and the US Latino community we have to still wrangle with the social and political consequences of the machismo and marianismo myths that permeate the cultures of Latin America.

Am listing all seven members of the Congressional Hispanics Caucus for a variety of reasons: If you are not looking closely, some of these votes do not make sense given the previous voting record of people like Costa ad Rodriguez. After all, wasn't Ciro Rodriguez a darling of the netroots? And yet when you look closely at their lists of donors, their votes actually become not just sinister but cynical as well (as in the case of John Salazar). So we can't just blame it on the fact that all of these guys happen to be Roman Catholics or members of the Blue Dog Coalition. It's those donors lists for 2008 and 2010 that really paint a clearer picture of their "conservatism".

Last but not least, compared to the Congressional Black Caucus, the CHC delegation voted atrociously : Artur Davis was the lone member of the CBC who voted for Stupak. Why couldn't the CHC conjure such discipline when voting a measure that would basically kill women's right to an abortion? Or are their votes exactly correlated to the 2007 "whore" scandal that rocked the CHC thanks to John Baca's leadership in disrespecting the women of the caucus?

Let's take a quick look at the faces of Los Siete Infames (the infamous 7) :
 more this way»

liza's picture



Texas State Rep. Betty Brown asks Asians why they can't have names like hers

This came right out of the mouth of a Betty Brown who couldn't for the life of her understand why Koreans and Chinese constituents insisted in making her life difficult with their not-in-English names. From Texas lawmaker suggests Asians adopt easier names :: Houston Chronicle:

"Rather than everyone here having to learn Chinese-- I understand it's a rather difficult language -- do you think that it would behoove you and your citizens to adopt a name that we could deal with more readily here"

Rep Betty Brown

Arrogant idiots like Rep. Betty Brown have the nerve to suggest we go back to a time when English language tests were used by racists and bigots everywhere in the United States as a way to disenfranchise millions of non-English speaking Americans citizens, particularly Puerto Ricans.

You know, because people who don't speak English for one reason or another can't have the right to vote.

You know, because it's just not possible that the United States may be technically a bilingual country thanks to that little colony they keep in the Caribbean called Puerto Rico.

Yet what is shocking is this woman's complete lack of understanding of the laws of the land: It is illegal to deny voting rights to any US citizen regardless of their language dominance.

My mother who is a white Puerto Rican woman was told the same thing over 45 years ago when she tried to vote for the first time in the United States. As a Puerto Rican, she is a full citizen and yet was treated as if she were an "illegal immigrant". It's not just that we have a separate culture, the language was a huge issue. For a lower-class white Puerto Rican woman it meant being barred from colleges and literally pushed to work in sweat shops and work herself from the bottom until she could command the language.

Yet we Puerto Ricans are political animals and my mother was inspired by Kennedy, an Irish-Catholic who kinofsortof sold himself to Latino communities as an "immigrant in his own land". When she went to register to vote for the first time, the woman looked at her and said something to the effect that, since she was a white woman anyway, why keep her spic-sounding name. It was because of this experience that my mother not only was hell bent on voting, but became a civil and voting rights activist.

Someday I'll write my mother's story so you can understand the year gaps in what am about to say. My mother met back in the 1960s the guy who helped write the "Puerto Rican Amendment" to the Voting Rights Act. It took her almost 40 years for my to marry Gilberto Gerena Valentín. Although am kind of old for the term, he's technically now my stepfather --and ironically the man who introduced my mother to my father.

Yes, my life is like a friggin' telenovela; but back to the topic at hand.

The Voting Rights Act was amended exactly so that misguided linguists and bigots alike could not claim "but this isn't about race" and still discriminate against non-English speaking minorities. In effect, "linguistic minority" was coined as a way to point to language, not ethnicity nor race as the motive for exclusion. As Gerena tells me, the reason why this was called "The Puerto Rican" and not the "Hispanic" or the "Mexican-American" amendment was simple: New York City had a patter of not just chasing Puerto Ricans away from the voting booths but of "spontaneous" apartment fires, evictions and even imprisonment in districts with heavy Puerto Rican populations. Bobby Kennedy, who had integrated the Attoney General's Office during his tenure, understood the power of this constituency. As US Senator, along with Jacob Javits, they introduced this measure in Washington not only as a shrewd move in minority politics but because tactically, it was a genius : You had full American citizens who, instead of being discriminated by race proved that discrimination was rampant in northern states ALSO based on language.

From :

Section 4(e)cases led to the recapture of three counties in New York City under Section 5 of the Act – forcing the City to prove that all future changes would not discriminate. Section 4(e)cases also allowed the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund to convince Congress in1975 that English only election systems were just as exclusive as other tests for voting inthe Deep South. And Section 4(e) cases showed the country that if bilingual electionscould work for Boricuas in New York City – the biggest city in the U.S. – they could work anywhere. This led to the bilingual elections for all Latinos, and Asian Americansand Native Americans as well.Forty years ago Puerto Ricans demanded that Congress protect their right to vote againstpolitical interests that excluded them from realizing their full political strength.Democracy in New York and in the United States has been more open and improved ever since.

That this woman, with one of the largest Mexican-American voting blocks in the nation doesn't know it's illegal to even hint at denying the right to vote to US citizens who don't speak English is amazing to me. So here's the text from the "Puerto Rican Amendment" to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. She needs to get schooled:
 more this way»

liza's picture



Culture Kitchen's Twenty-One State Endorsement Roundup

Well, I think 21 states is about my limit. Was considering trying to put together West Virginia and Oklahoma pages, but I think the following are all I can do before election day rolls over us. Look for your state. I cover whatever caught my attention from school board and port authority up to Governor and Senate races. It is compiled from Progressive Majority, INDN List, Daily Kos efforts and my own research. The only controversial one I endorsed was in Washington State, and you can see the contrary comment in that section (from a Republican with a chip on his shoulder, but still with a valid point). So here they are, the 2008 Culture Kitchen Twenty-One State Endorsement Roundup:

NORTH CAROLINA ENDORSEMENTS

MINNESOTA ENDORSEMENTS

ALASKA ENDORSEMENTS

MONTANA ENDORSEMENTS

OREGON ENDORSEMENTS

COLORADO ENDORSEMENTS

WYOMING ENDORSEMENTS

VIRGINIA ENDORSEMENTS

NEVADA ENDORSEMENTS

OHIO ENDORSEMENTS

IOWA ENDORSEMENTS

PENNSYLVANIA ENDORSEMENTS

WISCONSIN ENDORSEMENTS

MICHIGAN ENDORSEMENTS

WASHINGTON STATE ENDORSEMENTS

MISSOURI ENDORSEMENTS

NEW JERSEY ENDORSEMENTS

CALIFORNIA ENDORSEMENTS

ILLINOIS ENDORSEMENTS

ARIZONA ENDORSEMENTS

TEXAS ENDORSEMENTS

Please forgive me if I skipped your state or skipped candidates in your state. I am just one person!

mole333's picture



For our Texas Readers: an election day guide

Time to start putting together diaries recommending who to vote for in various states. In honor of our currently most loyal troll, (Blind) Eyes of Texas, I begin with some Texas recommendations. (many more states to come).

Here are some Texas candidates I urge you to support:

TexasBlogs have endorsed Chris Turner for State Representative against a very vulnerable Republican incumbent. So I want to highlight Chris's campaign.

Until January of 2008, Chris held the position of District Director in the office of Congressman Chet Edwards, a senior member of Congress who represents the 17th District of Texas and is the influential chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs. As District Director, Chris supervised three offices and a staff of ten and oversaw all district operations, including constituent services, outreach and special projects in the sprawling, 12-county district.

Chris has also managed Chet Edwards’ last four highly competitive and successful re-election campaigns, during which he was recognized for his leadership ability and organizational skills in the midst of challenging circumstances. So he knows what he is doing.
 more this way»

mole333's picture



Texas goes to Clinton and, guess what?

She won the popular vote by a sliver (4%).

Some people think that Rush Limbaugh's call to Republicans to go vote for Clinton may have something to do with it.

Early exit polling shows 10 percent of the voters in Ohio's Democratic Primary identified themselves as Republican, along with 22 percent who said they were independents. It was the same story in Texas: 10 percent of the voters in the Democratic primary identified themselves as Republican, along with 25 percent who said they were independents.

Funny, because I was being smacked around a week ago when I suggested that Republicans voting for Obama is a good thing. If they did vote for Clinton though, to throw off the race, we'll have hell to pay in November if she is the nominee.

Just as in Ohio, last minute voters went heavily to Clinton.

Just as in Ohio, gender wasn't an issue.

Race on the other hand ...

So Texas and Ohio were almost identical in outcome --although Clinton's winning margin was bigger in Ohio.

liza's picture



Syndicate content

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

"I believe in a wall between church and state so high that no one can climb over it.

"When religion controls government, political liberty dies; and when government controls religion, religious liberty perishes.

"Every American has the constitutional right not to be taxed or have his tax money expended for the establishment of religion.

"For too long the issue of government aid to church related organizations has been a divisive force in our society and in the Congress. It has erected communication barriers among our religions and fostered intolerance."

Poll